portfolio-review · git:20260518.000b56c · 2026-05-18 · sha256 77c4b5f4805944a3
portfolio-review git:20260518.000b56cB
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/77c4b5f4805944a3.
---
description: Review and analyze investment portfolio performance and allocation
---
# Portfolio Review
Comprehensive portfolio analysis and optimization recommendations.
## Phase 1 — Portfolio Snapshot
Start with a high-level summary before diving into details:
- Total portfolio value and cash position
- Number of holdings and average position size
- Date range of analysis
- Investor profile: risk tolerance (conservative / moderate / aggressive), time horizon, income vs. growth objective
## Phase 2 — Performance Analysis
1. **Absolute Returns**
- YTD, 1Y, 3Y, 5Y total return
- Compare against relevant benchmarks (S&P 500, Russell 2000, custom blended benchmark)
- Annualized return vs. benchmark — outperformance or underperformance in basis points
2. **Risk-Adjusted Returns**
- Sharpe ratio (excess return per unit of total risk)
- Sortino ratio (penalizes only downside volatility)
- Calmar ratio (annualized return / max drawdown)
- Information ratio vs. benchmark
3. **Drawdown Analysis**
- Maximum drawdown: peak-to-trough magnitude and duration
- Recovery period after each significant drawdown
- Drawdown frequency over the analysis window
- Compare portfolio drawdown vs. benchmark during market stress periods
4. **Volatility Metrics**
- Annualized standard deviation of returns
- Beta vs. S&P 500 (market sensitivity)
- Tracking error vs. benchmark
- Upside capture / downside capture ratios
## Phase 3 — Asset Allocation Review
1. **Current Allocation Breakdown**
- Asset class weights: equities, fixed income, cash, REITs, commodities, alternatives
- Equity sub-breakdown: US large cap, US small/mid cap, international developed, emerging markets
- Compare current weights to target/policy weights — flag deviations > 5%
2. **Geographic Diversification**
- US vs. international exposure (%)
- Country concentration risk — any single country > 20%?
- Currency exposure and hedging status
3. **Sector and Industry Weights**
- GICS sector breakdown vs. S&P 500 sector weights
- Overweight / underweight sectors and the investment thesis behind each
- Cyclical vs. defensive balance relative to current macro environment
4. **Market Cap Distribution**
- Large cap / mid cap / small cap split
- Growth vs. value tilt (P/E, P/B relative to benchmark)
- Quality factor exposure (ROE, balance sheet strength)
## Phase 4 — Holdings Review
1. **Individual Position Analysis**
- Position size as % of portfolio — flag any > 10% single-stock concentration
- Contribution to total return (winners vs. laggards)
- Unrealized gain/loss and holding period (tax impact)
2. **Position Sizing Discipline**
- Largest 5 positions — are sizes justified by conviction and risk/reward?
- Smallest positions — are they too small to be meaningful?
- Kelly criterion or volatility-scaled sizing check
3. **Overlap and Redundancy**
- Identify pairs of holdings with > 0.7 correlation
- ETF overlap analysis — holdings duplicated across ETFs
- Factor overlap: are multiple positions expressing the same single bet?
4. **Cost Efficiency**
- Weighted average expense ratio for ETF/fund holdings
- Estimated annual trading cost drag
- Tax lot optimization — identify specific lots to sell for tax efficiency
## Phase 5 — Optimization Recommendations
1. **Rebalancing Actions**
- List all positions with > 2% drift from target weight
- Priority order: largest drift first
- Tax-aware rebalancing: prioritize tax-loss harvesting in taxable accounts
- Proposed trades: ticker, action (buy/sell/trim), target weight, estimated proceeds
2. **Diversification Improvements**
- Specific gaps to fill (e.g., no international exposure, no inflation hedge)
- Correlation-reduction swaps: replace redundant holdings with uncorrelated alternatives
- Alternative asset candidates if appropriate (gold, TIPS, REITs, private credit proxies)
3. **Underperformer Review**
- For each position underperforming benchmark by > 10% over 1Y:
- Is the original thesis intact?
- Has fundamentals deteriorated or is this a temporary setback?
- Hold / average down / exit decision with rationale
4. **Upgrade Candidates**
- Positions to add based on current conviction and valuation
- New opportunities that fit the portfolio's existing factor tilts
- Cost reduction opportunities (replace active fund with cheaper ETF equivalent)
## Output Format
Deliver the review as a structured report with these sections:
1. Executive Summary (3–5 bullet points: biggest strengths and risks)
2. Performance Scorecard (table: metric | portfolio | benchmark | delta)
3. Allocation Heat Map (sector/geography breakdown in table form)
4. Holdings Table (position | weight | 1Y return | status: hold/trim/exit)
5. Action List (prioritized, with expected portfolio impact)
6. Implementation Roadmap (immediate / 30-day / 90-day actions)
Focus on actionable insights aligned with the investor's stated objectives and risk tolerance. Flag any positions or allocations that conflict with the investor profile.
## Standard Signal Output
All analysis concludes with this standardized block:
```
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ INVESTMENT SIGNAL ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Signal: BULLISH / NEUTRAL / BEARISH ║
║ Confidence: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW ║
║ Horizon: SHORT / MEDIUM / LONG-TERM ║
║ Score: X.X / 10 ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Action: BUY / HOLD / SELL ║
║ Conviction: STRONG / MODERATE / WEAK ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════╝
```
**Score Guide**: 8.0–10.0 Strongly Bullish | 6.0–7.9 Moderately Bullish | 4.0–5.9 Neutral | 2.0–3.9 Moderately Bearish | 0.0–1.9 Strongly Bearish
**Confidence**: HIGH (strong data, clear signals) | MEDIUM (mixed signals) | LOW (limited data, conflicting signals)
**Horizon**: SHORT-TERM (1 week–3 months) | MEDIUM-TERM (3 months–1 year) | LONG-TERM (1+ years)