git:20260901.37b6208 to git:20260901.3dabf81

---

namespace: aiwg

platforms: [all]

name: public-technology-review

description: Build a vendor-neutral, source-linked public-technology procurement evidence and risk review without autonomous scoring or award recommendations.

triggers:

- review a public technology procurement

- compare civic technology contract evidence

- assess public sector vendor lock in and lifecycle risk

---

# Public Technology Review

## Process

1. Select and cite the governing procurement profile; FAR/NIST are reference

models unless adopted by that jurisdiction.

2. Inventory need, planning, market research, solicitation, selection, award,

administration, oversight, and public-release records.

3. Separate protected proposals/source-selection material from public releases.

4. Record claims and evidence without sentiment scores. Risk ratings require a

human-defined scale, rationale, uncertainty, owner, and verification method.

5. Do not infer corruption, rank vendors, or recommend an award autonomously.

6. Record explicit handoff states for missing records, meeting/vote analysis,

and any publication packet; protected material never enters a public handoff.

## Output

A schema-valid evidence/risk review and human decision questions.

## References

- `schemas/public-technology-review.schema.json`

- `templates/public-technology-review.md`

- `docs/research/civic-workflow-standards.md`