git:20260816.96c9eb7 to git:20260827.8b48dbd

1 added, 1 removed. Audit A to A.

---
name: "Commit: Batch"
description: "Split uncommitted changes into granular commits."
when_to_use: "When several unrelated changes have piled up uncommitted and a single commit would bundle them; splits into one logical commit per change."
model: haiku
effort: low
metadata:
glyph: ᚺ
family: commit
disable-model-invocation: false
allowed-tools: ["Bash(git:*)"]
arguments: ["hints"]
argument-hint: "[grouping hints (optional), e.g. 'docs together, config separate']"
---
## Current state
```!
git status --short
- git diff --stat HEAD
+ git rev-parse --verify HEAD >/dev/null 2>&1 && git diff --stat HEAD || echo "(no commits yet, nothing to diff against)"
```
## Steps
1. The current state above was captured at invocation; run `git diff HEAD` on specific files only where the stat alone can't tell you what a change is.
2. Analyse the changes and group them into logical commit units; each group should represent a single coherent change (e.g. one feature, one fix, one refactor). If `$hints` was given, honour it as the intended grouping; it overrides the guidelines below where they conflict.
3. Present the proposed commit plan as a numbered list:
- Group name / files involved
- Suggested commit message (conventional commits format)
4. Await approval: **stop here and do not proceed until the user responds**:
- If approved, execute commits sequentially. For each group:
1. Stage **only** the files listed for that group (`git add <files>`)
2. Commit with the proposed message
3. Confirm success before moving to the next group
- If changes requested, revise the plan and repeat from step 3.
5. Report the commits made and stop. **Do not push.** Publishing is a separate decision from committing; the user pushes, or asks for it explicitly.
## Grouping Guidelines
- Prefer smaller, atomic commits over large ones
- Keep unrelated changes in separate commits even if they touch the same area
- Config/dependency changes separate from feature code
- Test changes alongside the code they test (same commit), unless the test is independent
- Generated files (lockfiles, build artefacts) get their own commit if significant
<template format-reference="https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/">
`type(scope?): description\n\nbody (optional)\n\nBREAKING CHANGE: footer (if applicable)`
</template>
<conventions>
- Subject line: imperative mood, lowercase, no period, max 50 chars (`add feature` not `added feature` or `adds feature`)
- Body: explain *what* and *why*, not *how*; wrap at 72 chars
</conventions>