founder-technical-decision · git:20261014.522e28a · 2026-10-14 · sha256 e7ec4b29054f03f7
founder-technical-decision git:20261014.522e28aA
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/e7ec4b29054f03f7.
--- name: founder-technical-decision description: "Writes ADRs for high-impact choices, classed as one-way or two-way doors, with trade-offs, opportunity cost and validation criteria. Use for /adr, /decision or a critical technical choice." --- # Founder Technical Decision (ADR Framework) ## Overview Founders and lead engineers must make hundreds of technical choices under extreme uncertainty. Jeff Bezos famously categorized decisions into **Type 1 (One-Way Doors: irreversible, high stakes)** and **Type 2 (Two-Way Doors: easily reversible, low cost to pivot)**. `founder-technical-decision` provides an executive Architecture Decision Record (ADR) format tailored for high-speed startup engineering. ## Decision Classification - **Type 1 (One-Way Door)**: Primary Database engine (Postgres vs MongoDB vs DynamoDB), Core multi-tenant isolation model, Primary programming language/runtime. *Approach*: Require deep evaluation, stress-testing, and written alternatives. - **Type 2 (Two-Way Door)**: UI component library, ORM vs raw SQL queries, email sending provider, specific charting library. *Approach*: Make the decision in under 15 minutes, pick the most familiar tool, move fast. ## Standard ADR Format Save in `brain/<conversation-id>/architecture_decision_[topic].md`: ```markdown # Architectural Decision Record: [Decision Title] ## 1. Context & Business Problem - What problem are we solving? - What are the operational and cost constraints? ## 2. Decision Classification - **Type**: [Type 1: One-Way Door / Type 2: Two-Way Door] - **Reversibility Score**: [High / Medium / Low] ## 3. Options Evaluated | Option | Pros | Cons | Est. Cost / Complexity | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | **Option A (Chosen)** | [Key advantages] | [Acceptable trade-offs] | [Low/Medium] | | **Option B** | [...] | [Why discarded] | [...] | | **Option C** | [...] | [Why discarded] | [...] | ## 4. Rationale & Trade-offs Accepted - Why Option A is optimal today. - What friction we are intentionally accepting. ## 5. Validation & Trigger to Re-evaluate - How do we know this decision was right? - What event or scale (e.g. 100k DAU) would trigger a redesign? ```