safety-pattern-auditor · git:20260108.1f3f357 · 2026-01-08 · sha256 bba63b27e6e101c5
safety-pattern-auditor git:20260108.1f3f357B
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/bba63b27e6e101c5.
---
name: safety-pattern-auditor
description: Systematic audit of safety patterns to identify gaps, regressions, and improvement opportunities
---
# Safety Pattern Auditor Skill
**Purpose**: Conduct comprehensive audits of safety pattern coverage to find vulnerabilities before attackers do.
**When to Use**:
- Before releases (QA gate)
- After adding multiple patterns (sanity check)
- Monthly security reviews
- When vulnerabilities are reported
**Duration**: 1-3 hours depending on audit scope
---
## Prerequisites
- [ ] Gap analyzer installed: `./scripts/analyze-pattern-gaps.py`
- [ ] Baseline captured: `./scripts/capture-safety-baseline.sh`
- [ ] Caro built: `cargo build --release`
- [ ] Test suite available: `.claude/beta-testing/test-cases.yaml`
---
## The 5-Phase Audit Workflow
```
Phase 1: Baseline Capture (10 min)
↓
Phase 2: Gap Analysis (20 min)
↓
Phase 3: Regression Testing (15 min)
↓
Phase 4: Priority Assessment (30 min)
↓
Phase 5: Report & Recommendations (30 min)
```
---
## Phase 1: Baseline Capture (10 minutes)
**Goal**: Establish current state of pattern coverage.
### Actions:
1. **Capture pattern metrics**:
```bash
./scripts/capture-safety-baseline.sh .claude/audits/baseline-$(date +%Y%m%d).json
```
2. **Review baseline**:
```bash
cat .claude/audits/baseline-$(date +%Y%m%d).json | python3 -m json.tool
```
Key metrics:
- Total pattern count
- Patterns by risk level (Critical/High/Medium)
- Test pass rates
3. **Document starting point**:
```markdown
## Audit Baseline - 2026-01-08
- Total Patterns: 52
- Critical: 23
- High: 16
- Medium: 0
- Test Pass Rate: 4/4 (100%)
```
### Output:
- [ ] Baseline JSON file created
- [ ] Metrics documented
- [ ] Starting point established
---
## Phase 2: Gap Analysis (20 minutes)
**Goal**: Use automated tools to find missing coverage.
### Actions:
1. **Run gap analyzer**:
```bash
./scripts/analyze-pattern-gaps.py src/safety/patterns.rs \
-o .claude/audits/gaps-$(date +%Y%m%d).md
```
2. **Review gap report**:
```bash
cat .claude/audits/gaps-$(date +%Y%m%d).md
```
3. **Categorize gaps by detector type**:
```bash
# Count gaps by type
grep "**Type**: argument_order" .claude/audits/gaps-*.md | wc -l
grep "**Type**: path_variant" .claude/audits/gaps-*.md | wc -l
grep "**Type**: wildcard" .claude/audits/gaps-*.md | wc -l
grep "**Type**: platform" .claude/audits/gaps-*.md | wc -l
```
4. **Extract critical gaps**:
```bash
./scripts/analyze-pattern-gaps.py src/safety/patterns.rs \
--min-severity critical
```
### Gap Categories:
**Argument Order Gaps**:
- Flags in different positions
- Combined vs separated flags
- Missing permutations
**Path Variant Gaps**:
- Trailing slashes
- Relative vs absolute paths
- Recursive parent references
**Wildcard Gaps**:
- Missing glob patterns
- Recursive wildcards (**)
- Hidden file patterns (.*)
**Platform Gaps**:
- PowerShell equivalents missing
- CMD command variants
- Cross-platform coverage
### Output:
- [ ] Gap report generated
- [ ] Gaps categorized by type
- [ ] Critical gaps identified
- [ ] Total gap count documented
---
## Phase 3: Regression Testing (15 minutes)
**Goal**: Ensure no regressions introduced recently.
### Actions:
1. **Run regression checker**:
```bash
./scripts/check-safety-regressions.sh .claude/audits/baseline-*.json
```
2. **Run full test suite**:
```bash
./target/release/caro test --backend static \
--suite .claude/beta-testing/test-cases.yaml
```
3. **Check pattern compilation**:
```bash
cargo test --lib safety::patterns --quiet
```
4. **Test false positives** (sample safe commands):
```bash
echo "cd .." | ./target/release/caro --backend static
echo "ls -la" | ./target/release/caro --backend static
echo "cp file.txt backup/" | ./target/release/caro --backend static
```
All should be ALLOWED.
### Red Flags:
- ❌ Pattern count decreased
- ❌ Risk level downgrades (Critical → High)
- ❌ Test pass rate dropped
- ❌ False positives (safe commands blocked)
- ❌ Compilation errors
### Output:
- [ ] No regressions detected
- [ ] Test pass rate maintained
- [ ] False positive check passed
- [ ] Compilation successful
---
## Phase 4: Priority Assessment (30 minutes)
**Goal**: Triage gaps and create action plan.
### Actions:
1. **Count gaps by severity**:
```bash
./scripts/analyze-pattern-gaps.py src/safety/patterns.rs \
--format json | jq '.gaps | group_by(.severity) | map({severity: .[0].severity, count: length})'
```
2. **Assess each critical gap**:
For each critical gap, determine:
- Real-world likelihood (High/Medium/Low)
- Ease of exploitation (Easy/Medium/Hard)
- Existing coverage (None/Partial/Full)
- Fix complexity (Simple/Medium/Complex)
3. **Create priority matrix**:
| Gap ID | Severity | Likelihood | Ease | Coverage | Fix | Priority |
|--------|----------|------------|------|----------|-----|----------|
| GAP-001 | Critical | High | Easy | None | Simple | P0 |
| GAP-002 | Critical | Medium | Medium | Partial | Medium | P1 |
| GAP-015 | High | High | Easy | None | Simple | P1 |
**Priority Levels**:
- **P0**: Fix immediately (Critical + High likelihood + Easy exploit)
- **P1**: Fix this release (Critical or High + likely)
- **P2**: Fix next release (Medium/Low risk or complex fix)
- **P3**: Backlog (Low priority, document only)
4. **Estimate effort**:
```
P0 gaps: 3 × 1h = 3 hours
P1 gaps: 8 × 1h = 8 hours
P2 gaps: 15 × 1h = 15 hours
Total: 26 hours to close all high-priority gaps
```
### Output:
- [ ] Gaps prioritized (P0/P1/P2/P3)
- [ ] Priority matrix created
- [ ] Effort estimated
- [ ] Action plan drafted
---
## Phase 5: Report & Recommendations (30 minutes)
**Goal**: Produce actionable audit report with clear next steps.
### Actions:
1. **Generate executive summary**:
```markdown
# Safety Pattern Audit Report - 2026-01-08
## Executive Summary
**Status**: 🟡 NEEDS ATTENTION
- Total Patterns: 52
- Gaps Found: 202 (21 critical, 90 high, 87 medium, 4 low)
- Regressions: 0
- False Positives: 0
- Test Coverage: 100%
**Key Findings**:
- 21 critical gaps require immediate attention
- Argument order variations are the most common gap type
- Platform coverage (PowerShell/CMD) is incomplete
**Recommendation**: Address 3 P0 gaps before next release.
```
2. **Create detailed findings**:
Use the gap analyzer report + your assessments.
3. **List actionable recommendations**:
```markdown
## Recommendations
### Immediate (P0) - Complete before release
1. **GAP-003**: Add parent directory deletion pattern
- Command: `rm -rf ../`
- Effort: 1 hour
- Owner: Security team
2. **GAP-012**: Add dd argument order pattern
- Command: `dd of=/dev/sda if=/dev/zero`
- Effort: 1 hour
- Owner: Security team
3. **GAP-018**: Add recursive wildcard pattern
- Command: `rm -rf **`
- Effort: 1 hour
- Owner: Security team
### Short-term (P1) - Next 2 weeks
[List P1 gaps with estimates]
### Long-term (P2) - Next quarter
[List P2 gaps]
### Process Improvements
- Run gap analyzer in CI/CD before merge
- Add pre-commit hook to block pattern regressions
- Monthly security audit schedule
```
4. **Track audit metrics over time**:
```markdown
## Trend Analysis
| Date | Patterns | Critical Gaps | High Gaps | Total Gaps |
|------|----------|---------------|-----------|------------|
| 2025-12-01 | 45 | 28 | 102 | 215 |
| 2026-01-01 | 48 | 24 | 95 | 205 |
| 2026-01-08 | 52 | 21 | 90 | 202 |
**Trend**: ✅ Improving (gaps decreasing)
```
5. **Save audit artifacts**:
```bash
mkdir -p .claude/audits/2026-01-08/
mv .claude/audits/baseline-*.json .claude/audits/2026-01-08/
mv .claude/audits/gaps-*.md .claude/audits/2026-01-08/
cp priority-matrix.md .claude/audits/2026-01-08/
```
### Output:
- [ ] Executive summary written
- [ ] Findings documented
- [ ] Recommendations prioritized
- [ ] Audit artifacts saved
- [ ] Report shared with team
---
## Quick Reference: Audit Checklist
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SAFETY PATTERN AUDIT CHECKLIST │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ☐ Phase 1: Baseline captured │
│ ☐ Phase 2: Gap analyzer run │
│ ☐ Phase 3: Regression tests passed │
│ ☐ Phase 4: Gaps prioritized (P0/P1/P2/P3) │
│ ☐ Phase 5: Report written & shared │
│ │
│ ☐ No regressions detected │
│ ☐ No false positives found │
│ ☐ P0 gaps identified (<3 acceptable) │
│ ☐ Action plan with owners assigned │
│ ☐ Audit artifacts saved │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
---
## Audit Frequency Recommendations
### Pre-Release Audit (Mandatory)
- Run before every release
- Focus: Regressions + critical gaps
- Duration: 1 hour
- Gate: Must pass to release
### Monthly Security Audit (Recommended)
- Full 5-phase audit
- Focus: Comprehensive gap analysis
- Duration: 2-3 hours
- Output: Trend analysis + roadmap
### Post-Incident Audit (As needed)
- Triggered by vulnerability reports
- Focus: Similar patterns + root cause
- Duration: 1-2 hours
- Output: Immediate fixes + prevention
---
## Audit Report Template
See `examples/audit-report-template.md` for a complete template.
Key sections:
1. Executive Summary
2. Baseline Metrics
3. Gap Analysis Findings
4. Regression Test Results
5. Priority Matrix
6. Recommendations
7. Trend Analysis
8. Next Steps
---
## Success Criteria
Audit is complete when:
- ✅ All 5 phases executed
- ✅ Baseline captured and documented
- ✅ Gap report generated
- ✅ No regressions found
- ✅ Gaps prioritized (P0/P1/P2/P3)
- ✅ P0 gaps ≤ 3 (or documented exceptions)
- ✅ Report written with recommendations
- ✅ Artifacts saved for historical tracking
- ✅ Action items assigned with owners
---
## Integration with Gap Analyzer
The auditor skill wraps the gap analyzer tool with:
- Baseline comparison over time
- Priority assessment framework
- Reporting and tracking
- Action planning
**Gap Analyzer** (automated):
- Finds technical gaps
- Categorizes by type
- Rates severity
**Auditor Skill** (human-guided):
- Assesses business impact
- Prioritizes fixes
- Tracks trends
- Creates action plans
---
## Common Findings & Solutions
### Finding: High critical gap count
**Typical**: 20+ critical gaps
**Solution**: Focus on P0 subset (3-5 gaps), tackle incrementally
### Finding: Argument order gaps dominate
**Typical**: 60%+ are argument order
**Solution**: Use flexible regex patterns with optional groups
### Finding: Platform coverage incomplete
**Typical**: 30+ PowerShell gaps
**Solution**: Create platform-specific patterns with shell_specific field
### Finding: Test coverage low
**Typical**: <50% pass rate
**Solution**: Expand test suite before adding patterns
---
## Getting Help
**Resources**:
- Gap Analyzer: `./scripts/analyze-pattern-gaps.py --help`
- Baseline Tool: `./scripts/capture-safety-baseline.sh`
- Regression Checker: `./scripts/check-safety-regressions.sh`
- Pattern Developer Skill: `.claude/skills/safety-pattern-developer/`
**If stuck**:
1. Review `examples/audit-report-template.md`
2. Check previous audit artifacts in `.claude/audits/`
3. Consult gap analyzer design doc
4. Ask in #safety-patterns channel
---
*This skill provides systematic auditing to maintain high safety pattern quality and catch vulnerabilities early.*