vscode-doctor · git:20260531.b783b43 · 2026-05-31 · sha256 cc2cfa09e7549d93
vscode-doctor git:20260531.b783b43A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/cc2cfa09e7549d93.
--- name: vscode-doctor description: Diagnose slow or freezing VS Code-compatible editors with evidence-first, zero-hardcoded-assumption workflow. Use when the user reports editor lag, typing delay, UI freezes, extension host stalls, file watcher noise, high editor CPU/RSS, or wants a safe editor performance audit. allowed-tools: Bash, Read metadata: argument-hint: "[workspace-root optional]" --- # VS Code Doctor Diagnose editor performance from the current machine state. Do not import old observations, fixed paths, fixed extension names, fixed OS bugs, or fixed generated-directory lists into the diagnosis. ## Non-Negotiables - No hardcoded local paths. Use the user's stated workspace, discovered editor status, or explicit placeholders. - No fixed root cause order. Rank only by fresh evidence from this run. - No fixed extension blocklist. Treat extension names as evidence only when they appear in live output or user-provided screenshots. - No fixed generated-directory list. Discover ignored/generated paths from the workspace, editor settings, repository metadata, or user-provided patterns. - No fixed benefit percentages. If there is no before/after baseline, say the impact cannot be reliably quantified. - No write operations by default. Do not edit settings, disable extensions, delete caches, run system defaults, change environment variables, or kill processes without explicit confirmation. ## Collection Run the collector with values discovered for this case. Leave unknown values empty instead of inventing them. ```bash cd <path-to-vscode-doctor-skill> EDITOR_COMMANDS="<space-separated editor cli commands, if known>" \ EDITOR_PROCESS_QUERY="<process regex, if known>" \ EDITOR_DATA_DIRS="<colon-separated data dirs, if known>" \ EDITOR_SETTINGS_FILES="<colon-separated settings files, if known>" \ EDITOR_LOG_DIRS="<colon-separated log dirs, if known>" \ LOG_FILE_GLOB="<log file glob, if known>" \ LOG_SIGNAL_QUERY="<log regex, if known>" \ GENERATED_DIR_PATTERNS="<colon-separated generated directory names, if user/project supplied>" \ ./scripts/collect_vscode_diagnostics.sh "<workspace-root>" ``` Discovery rules: - If the user gives the opened workspace, pass it as the script argument. - If the user does not give the workspace, infer it from editor status output, visible state, or ask a concise question. - If an editor CLI/path/log directory cannot be discovered, skip that probe and state that the evidence is missing. - If a signal comes from logs, include the log path and timestamp. ## Analysis Classify each finding by evidence strength: - **High priority**: current CPU/RSS/log/status evidence directly explains the symptom and the next experiment is low risk. - **Medium priority**: plausible contributor with partial evidence, or a safe optimization whose current impact is not proven. - **Low priority**: maintenance or cleanup item without direct evidence of causing the symptom. Common evidence types to look for, without assuming any one must exist: - editor main/renderer/extension-host process CPU or RSS - language service or extension child-process CPU/RSS - file watcher errors or repeated workspace rescans - large workspace surface area from editor status, VCS metadata, or ignored/generated paths - repeated extension-host unresponsive signals - UI process pressure that correlates with editor renderer activity - cache or storage size only when it is large enough to plausibly matter When recommending extension changes: - Use only extension names seen in live output, user screenshots, or logs. - Prefer workspace-scoped disablement or profiling over global disablement. - If the evidence only shows “extension host high,” recommend profiling or bisecting before naming a culprit. When recommending workspace exclusions: - Prefer exclusions derived from the project's own ignored/generated paths. - If you propose a generic pattern, label it as a template for user review, not as evidence. - Prefer workspace settings over global settings when the issue is tied to one workspace. ## Report Template Use this concise structure: ```markdown ## Editor Performance Diagnosis ### Evidence | Signal | Current value | Source | Confidence | |----|----|----|----| | ... | ... | ... | high/medium/low | ### Priority #### High 1. ... #### Medium 1. ... #### Low 1. ... ### Options | Option | When to use | Expected impact | Cost | Verify | Roll back | |----|----|----|----|----|----| | ... | ... | Cannot quantify without baseline / based on observed delta | ... | ... | ... | ### Next Step Ask the user which option to run first. Do not apply changes until they confirm. ``` ## Verification Before claiming improvement, collect a fresh after-snapshot with the same collector inputs used for the baseline. Compare only observed values: ```markdown ## Before / After | Metric | Before | After | Result | |----|----:|----:|----| | ... | ... | ... | improved / unchanged / worse / unknown | Conclusion: - Experiment result: ... - Remaining evidence: ... - Next step: ... - Rollback: ... ``` If the before snapshot is missing, write: `缺少调整前 baseline,无法可靠量化收益`.