rem-investigate-person · diff
git:20261002.2523ee4 to git:20261002.1ddebc5
4 added, 4 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: rem-investigate-person
description: Read a person’s identity, relationship and obligations from gathered evidence.
---
# Investigating a person
Why these rules: docs/rem-skills/rem-investigate.md
## Identity is given, not guessed
- The user's addresses (the mailbox names in coverage) are never the subject's;
`Email`/`Handles` take only addresses the subject writes from.
- Every handle you were given, wrong spellings too, goes in `Also known as:`;
add the ones you discover (signature, second address, other script). Company
names go in their own field.
- The subject is the owner of a coverage mailbox → the user's own page: follow
`rem-owner-page`.
- **A role in a list the user writes about someone else is that person's, not
the user's.** A role is the subject's only when the subject states it or
someone states it about them.
- Another page for the same person: name it in `Uncertainties`; do not merge.
## Reading the mail
- **The `investigation:facts` item first**: put each extracted value in its
cited `Facts` field. Read `Signature`, `Calendar` and mail signatures for role,
company, office, location and time zone. Date signature changes; keep both
phones with qualifiers.
- `Phone` means the person's contact number, never a meeting dial-in, passcode
or attendee's number. Calendar text is context, not their contact details.
- - **Address domain = employer**, never a role; gmail/outlook/qq/163 →
- `Company: Unknown`. Link a matching `investigation:org-pages` entry as
- `[Name](../orgs/<file>.md)`, citing the mail.
+ - A domain identifies an organisation, not employment. Student affiliation
+ is not an employer; unstated employer → `Company: Unknown`. Link a matching
+ organisation in the relationship text, citing the mail.
- `[attachment]` entries are the file's text; the terms are there; cite their id.
An unreadable attachment → your final reply.
- Mail gives identity and commitments; sessions give intent. Sources disagree →
say so; stated in one and implied in another → cite both.
- Check asks/promises across topics before `Nothing open`; unrelated replies
close none. Questions promise no deadline. Invites, confirmed logistics,
arrival, empty forwards or samples do not prove completion.
- Thread context can resolve a group ask after recipients drop. Match the team
and ask; one thread can mix both. Preserve requester, decision maker and debtor;
context is not this person's statement, contact date or assigned work.
## What to produce
Follow `rem-page-person` exactly, the lead above `Facts` included:
`co rem list people --aliases` reads its headings and `Contact` labels. **`Open threads` is mandatory**: who owes what,
since when.
**Insight, three shapes** (never copy these facts):
- - `At stake: the user has owed Mia the revised SOW for 12 days; her signing date is 3 October [5]`
+ - `At stake: Mia requested the revised SOW on 2026-09-21; it is due 2026-10-03 [5]`
- `Changed: replies went from same-day to none since 2026-08-20, after the price went to A$15k [6][8]`
- `Pattern: every thread since June is invoices; she chases, the user answers in 2–4 days [2][7]`