iterate-plan ยท diff

v1.0.0 to git:20260605.71053fc

6 added, 137 removed. Audit A to A.

---
name: iterate-plan
- description: "Update existing implementation plans based on feedback or changed requirements. **ALWAYS use when** the user says 'update the plan', 'change the plan', 'the requirements changed', 'revise the approach', or wants to modify an existing plan in thoughts/shared/plans/ after review feedback or discovered issues."
+ description: "[MOVED] This skill migrated to the catalyst-legacy plugin in catalyst-dev v11.0.0 (CTL-726). Use /catalyst-legacy:iterate-plan."
disable-model-invocation: true
- allowed-tools: Read, Write, Task, Bash, Grep, Glob
- version: 1.0.0
---
- # Iterate Plan
-
- You are tasked with updating an existing implementation plan based on user feedback,
- partial implementation results, or changed requirements. You update plans with
- research-backed modifications, not just text edits.
-
- ## Prerequisites
-
- ```bash
- # Check project setup (thoughts, CLAUDE.md snippet, config)
- if [[ -f "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/check-project-setup.sh" ]]; then
- "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/check-project-setup.sh" || exit 1
- fi
-
- # Auto-discover most recent plan (workflow context + filesystem fallback)
- RECENT_PLAN=""
- if [[ -f "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/workflow-context.sh" ]]; then
- RECENT_PLAN=$("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/workflow-context.sh" recent plans)
- fi
- if [[ -n "$RECENT_PLAN" ]]; then
- echo "๐Ÿ“‹ Auto-discovered recent plan: $RECENT_PLAN"
- else
- echo "โš ๏ธ No recent plan found in workflow context or filesystem"
- fi
- ```
-
- ## Initial Response
-
- Auto-discovery has already run in Prerequisites above. Check its output and follow this priority:
-
- 1. **If user provided a plan file path**: Use the provided path (user override). Read it FULLY immediately.
- 2. **If no path provided AND Prerequisites discovered a plan (๐Ÿ“‹)**: Show the path and ask "**Update this plan?** [Y/n]"
- 3. **If no path AND no plan found (โš ๏ธ)**: Ask user to provide the plan file path
-
- Then ask: "What changes need to be made to this plan?"
-
- ## Process Steps
-
- ### Step 1: Read and Understand the Existing Plan
-
- 1. Read the plan document FULLY (no limit/offset)
- 2. Identify all phases, success criteria, and current completion state
- 3. Note which phases are already completed vs pending
- 4. Understand the overall architecture and approach
-
- ### Step 2: Understand the Requested Changes
-
- Parse the user's feedback:
- - **Scope changes**: Adding/removing phases or features
- - **Technical corrections**: Wrong approach, better alternative discovered
- - **Feedback from review**: Reviewer comments on the plan
- - **Partial implementation learnings**: Things discovered during implementation
- - **Requirement changes**: Business requirements shifted
-
- ### Step 3: Research If Needed
-
- If the changes require new technical understanding:
-
- 1. Spawn parallel sub-agents to research the codebase:
- - **codebase-locator** to find relevant files
- - **codebase-analyzer** to understand current implementation
- - **codebase-pattern-finder** to find similar patterns
-
- 2. Wait for ALL agents to complete before modifying the plan
-
- 3. Present research findings to user before making changes:
- ```
- Based on my research:
- - [Finding 1 with file:line reference]
- - [Finding 2 with file:line reference]
-
- This affects the plan in these ways:
- - [Impact 1]
- - [Impact 2]
-
- Shall I proceed with these updates?
- ```
-
- ### Step 4: Update the Plan
-
- 1. Preserve completed phases unchanged (unless explicitly asked to modify)
- 2. Update pending phases with new information
- 3. Add new phases if scope expanded
- 4. Remove phases if scope narrowed
- 5. Update success criteria to reflect changes
- 6. Add an "Iteration History" section at the bottom:
-
- ```markdown
- ## Iteration History
-
- ### Iteration 1 - YYYY-MM-DD
- **Reason**: [Why the plan was updated]
- **Changes**:
- - [Phase X]: [What changed and why]
- - [Phase Y]: [Added/removed/modified]
- **Research conducted**: [[research-doc-filename]] โ€” [Brief summary, if any]
- ```
-
- ### Step 5: Save and Sync
-
- 1. Save the updated plan (overwrite the existing file)
- 2. Sync thoughts: `humanlayer thoughts sync`
- 3. Track in workflow context (REQUIRED) โ€” substitute actual path and ticket:
- ```bash
- "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/workflow-context.sh" add plans "thoughts/shared/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-description.md" "TICKET-ID"
- ```
- 4. Verify: `"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/workflow-context.sh" recent plans` must print the path
-
- ### Step 6: Present Summary
-
- ```
- Plan updated!
-
- **Plan**: [file path]
- **Changes made**:
- - [Summary of each change]
-
- **Impact on implementation**:
- - Phases affected: [list]
- - New phases added: [list, if any]
- - Phases removed: [list, if any]
-
- Please review the updated plan.
- ```
+ # iterate-plan โ€” moved to catalyst-legacy
- ## Important Guidelines
+ The wave-based orchestration workflow moved out of catalyst-dev in v11.0.0.
- 1. **Research before modifying** โ€” Don't just edit text; verify changes against the codebase
- 2. **Preserve completed work** โ€” Never modify phases marked as done unless explicitly asked
- 3. **Update success criteria** โ€” Every plan change must have corresponding criteria updates
- 4. **Track iterations** โ€” Always add to the Iteration History section
- 5. **Read fully** โ€” Always read the entire plan before making changes
- 6. **No open questions** โ€” Resolve all uncertainties before saving
+ **Use `/catalyst-legacy:iterate-plan` instead.**
- **IMPORTANT: Document Storage Rules**
- - ALWAYS write to `thoughts/shared/plans/` for plan documents
- - NEVER write to `thoughts/searchable/` โ€” this is a read-only search index
+ catalyst-dev now ships the phase-agent / execution-core model. See
+ `docs/orchestrator-overview.md` for the current pipeline.