create-context-file · diff
v1.0.0 to v1.0.0
41 added, 1 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: create-context-file
description: "Creates a structured, date-stamped context file filed by typology (findings, plans, goals, evidence, guides, follow-ups, merge-requests, tickets, decisions, notes, research) with YAML frontmatter. Use when saving a finding, writing a plan, capturing a guide, recording a decision, logging a follow-up, filing a merge-request note, capturing work as progression evidence, plus ticket write-ups."
license: MIT
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
audience: agents
workflow: capture, planning, documentation
---
# Create Context File
Persist a working artifact into the project's context directory, filed by
**typology** and named with a date prefix so it sorts chronologically and never
collides.
## When to Use
- Save an investigation write-up, plan, guide, or decision produced while working.
- Capture a follow-up, merge-request note, or ticket write-up for later.
- The user asks to "save this finding", "create a plan", or "write this up".
## When Not to Use
- Do NOT use for technical notes that belong inline in source — write a code comment.
- Do NOT use for permanent, long-lived docs — use the README or docs site.
- Do NOT use for issue tracking — use the issue tracker.
- Do NOT use for content the team consumes externally — use the docs system.
## Principles
1. **Typology is the organizing axis.** ALWAYS choose the folder by *what the
artifact is*, not by how long it lives.
2. **One artifact, one file.** ALWAYS keep a single typology per file; NEVER
merge a finding with a plan.
3. **Deterministic names.** The generator MUST own the filename and frontmatter;
never hand-craft them.
4. **Curated growth.** Extend the typology set deliberately, not per task.
## Workflow
1. Choose the typology from the curated set. — **Stop if:** none fits and the
need will not recur; reuse the closest match instead of adding a folder.
2. Inspect what already exists for that typology to avoid duplicates:
```bash
ls .context/findings/
```
Expected result: the existing files, so you can confirm none already covers
this artifact.
3. Run the generator with a specific, task-tied title. — **Verify:** the printed
path uses the expected typology plus date.
4. Fill in the body beneath the generated heading. — **Stop if:** the content
spans two typologies; split it into separate files.
## Quick Commands
```bash
# Create a finding with tags
./scripts/create-context-file.sh --type findings --title "Auth token analysis" \
--tags "auth,oauth"
```
Expected result: a new dated finding file, printed as the only stdout line.
```bash
# Link a finding back to the plan it informed
./scripts/create-context-file.sh --type findings --title "Auth token analysis" \
--related "../plans/2026-03-16-auth-rollout.md"
```
Expected result: a dated finding file whose frontmatter includes a `related:`
list; when no `--related` is given, the key is omitted entirely rather than
written as `related: []`.
```bash
# Follow-up that can't start until a plan lands
./scripts/create-context-file.sh --type follow-ups --title "Wire up token refresh" \
--blocked-by "../plans/2026-03-16-auth-rollout.md"
```
Expected result: a dated follow-up file whose frontmatter includes a
`blocked-by:` list, in the same "omitted when empty" style as `related`. The
`context-index` skill's `scripts/context-ready.sh` reads this field across
every context file to report which active files have zero open blockers —
set `--blocks` on the file being depended on, `--blocked-by` on the file
doing the depending, or both if the relationship is worth recording from
either side.
```bash
+ # Follow-up with confirmed grades (only after the user has confirmed them)
+ ./scripts/create-context-file.sh --type follow-ups --title "Wire up token refresh" \
+ --severity HIGH --priority P2 --graded 2026-10-07
+ ```
+
+ Expected result: a dated follow-up file whose frontmatter ends with
+ `severity:`, `priority:` and `graded:` lines, in that order, just before the
+ closing `---`. Pass all three flags together: the generator rejects any one
+ alone, and rejects all three on any typology other than `follow-ups`.
+
+ ```bash
# Multi-line body via heredoc
./scripts/create-context-file.sh --type plans --title "Retriever rollout" << 'EOF'
## Phase 1
...
EOF
```
Expected result: a dated plan file containing the heredoc body.
```bash
# Preview without writing
./scripts/create-context-file.sh --type merge-requests --title "PROJ-1234" --dry-run
```
Expected result: the target path plus full file body printed; nothing written.
```bash
# A deliberate one-off typology
./scripts/create-context-file.sh --type experiments --title "spike" --allow-new-type
```
Expected result: a file under a new typology folder, created knowingly.
Full option list: see the CLI reference below.
+ ## Filing a follow-up
+
+ Grade a follow-up with a `severity` and a `priority`, so that whatever lists
+ follow-ups can put the most pressing first. Use the
+ [grading rubric](references/follow-up-grading.md) to choose them. The user, not
+ the agent, must settle each grade, because grades steer what gets done next:
+
+ 1. Propose a `severity` and a `priority` from the rubric. Give a one-line
+ reason drawn from each decision test.
+ 2. Wait for the user to confirm or change them, or to leave the follow-up
+ ungraded.
+ 3. Pass `--severity`, `--priority` and `--graded` (today's date) only after that
+ confirmation. Leave a follow-up without an answer ungraded. Never invent a
+ `--graded` date.
+
## Anti-Patterns
### NEVER create a file without checking the typology folder first
**WHY:** the same artifact captured twice fragments context and breaks search.
**BAD:** run the generator immediately for a plan that already exists.
**GOOD:** list the folder, confirm nothing covers it, then create.
**Consequence:** duplicate, drifting files that later readers cannot reconcile —
a common pitfall once a repository grows.
### NEVER use a generic slug like `notes` or `todo`
**WHY:** vague slugs collide and read as noise when sorted by date.
**BAD:** `--title "notes"` yields a `notes.md` that clashes across tasks.
**GOOD:** `--title "API refactor findings"` yields a specific, searchable name.
**Consequence:** unsearchable filenames plus silent name clashes in production
repositories.
### NEVER mix typologies in one file
**WHY:** a finding, a plan, and a follow-up have different lifecycles and readers.
**BAD:** one file holding analysis, a rollout plan, and open questions.
**GOOD:** three files, one per typology, cross-referenced if needed.
**Consequence:** no file can be retired cleanly; each keeps stale content alive.
### NEVER hand-edit the filename or frontmatter date
**WHY:** the date prefix plus ISO `date` power sorting and downstream tooling.
**BAD:** rename to drop the date, or set `date: Jul 21st`.
**GOOD:** let the generator produce both; keep the original date on later edits.
**Consequence:** broken chronological ordering plus frontmatter parse failures.
### NEVER emit `related: []`, `blocks: []`, or `blocked-by: []` when there is nothing to list
**WHY:** an empty list is noise; the field should be absent when there is
nothing to link.
**BAD:** `related: []` (or `blocks: []` / `blocked-by: []`) in the frontmatter.
**GOOD:** omit the key entirely; pass `--related`/`--blocks`/`--blocked-by`
only when there is at least one path to list.
**Consequence:** frontmatter clutter that trains readers (and tooling) to
ignore the field, masking the times it actually carries a link.
### NEVER set `blocked-by` on a file whose blocker is unlikely to ever reach `status: done`
**WHY:** `context-ready.sh` fails closed — an unresolvable blocker path, or
one that sits at a status other than `done` indefinitely, keeps the
dependent file reported as blocked forever, with no automatic timeout.
**BAD:** pointing `blocked-by` at a typology whose typical lifecycle is "keep
indefinitely" or "keep while active" rather than a discrete close (see the
lifecycle column in [Typologies](references/typologies.md)) — e.g. a
`guide` or `research` file nobody plans to ever mark `done`.
**GOOD:** point `blocked-by` at a typology whose lifecycle is a real
close event (`plan` retiring, `follow-up` closing, `ticket` tracked to
resolution, `merge-request` retiring after merge) — or record the
relationship in prose instead if it isn't really "done-or-not-done" shaped.
**Consequence:** a file that can never actually be reported ready, with
nothing in `context-ready.sh`'s output explaining that the blocker itself is
the problem rather than the work.
+ ### NEVER write `severity`, `priority` or `graded` the user has not confirmed
+
+ **WHY:** a grade steers which follow-up gets picked up next, and nothing in the
+ file records who chose it.
+
+ **BAD:** passing `--severity HIGH --priority P1 --graded <today>` because the
+ rubric seemed to fit.
+ **GOOD:** propose the grades with a reason, wait for the user's answer, then
+ pass the flags (or file the follow-up ungraded).
+
+ **Consequence:** an agent-chosen grade ranks above work a person judged more
+ pressing, and reads as a person's decision.
+
### NEVER invent a new typology for a one-off
**WHY:** ad-hoc folders erode the curated set that makes context navigable.
**BAD:** create a bespoke folder for a single throwaway note.
**GOOD:** reuse the closest typology, or pass `--allow-new-type` knowingly.
**Consequence:** folder sprawl that defeats predictable retrieval — a slow pitfall.
## References
- [Typologies](references/typologies.md) — the curated catalog, selection rule, and how to extend the set; load when choosing or adding a typology.
- [CLI reference](references/cli.md) — full generator flags, behavior, and examples; load when you need an option beyond the Quick Commands.
- - [Frontmatter schema](assets/schemas/context-frontmatter.schema.json) — the JSON Schema for `title`, `type`, `date`, `status`, `tags`, `related`, `blocks`, and `blocked-by`; load when validating a context file's frontmatter or wiring a lint check.
+ - [Follow-up grading](references/follow-up-grading.md) — the decision test for each `severity` and `priority` value, who sets a grade, and the sort order; load when filing a follow-up or grading a batch of them.
+ - [Frontmatter schema](assets/schemas/context-frontmatter.schema.json) — the JSON Schema for `title`, `type`, `date`, `status`, `tags`, `related`, `blocks`, `blocked-by`, and the follow-up grades `severity`, `priority` and `graded`; load when validating a context file's frontmatter or wiring a lint check. Nothing runs it yet.