analogical-transfer · git:20260616.b2b0cde · 2026-06-16 · sha256 bf960dce5b59585d
analogical-transfer git:20260616.b2b0cdeA
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/bf960dce5b59585d.
--- name: analogical-transfer description: Systematic structure-mapping from source to target domain (Gentner). Identify relational correspondences and transfer higher-order constraints. execution: strategy dependencies: sops: - abstraction-extraction - analogy-quality-assessment - cross-domain-synthesis - structural-mapping - transfer-adaptation tactics: - bridge-validation - domain-divergence --- # Analogical Transfer Systematic structure-mapping from source to target domain following Gentner's structure-mapping theory. Prioritize relational similarity over surface similarity. ## State Ledger | Resource | Target | Current | % | |----------|--------|---------|---| | web-search | 25 | 0 | 0% | | web-research | 10 | 0 | 0% | | paper-overview | 30 | 0 | 0% | | paper-search | 20 | 0 | 0% | | paper-research | 8 | 0 | 0% | ## HARD-GATE Cannot exit strategy until ≥80% of each budget line is consumed OR yield targets are met with justification for remaining budget. ## Available Tactics | Tactic | Role | |--------|------| | analogy-extraction | Core tactic — extract and validate structural analogies | | domain-divergence | Find distant source domains with high structural similarity | | bridge-validation | Validate mapping depth before transfer | ## Available SOPs | SOP | Role | |-----|------| | domain-scanning | Find candidate source domains | | abstraction-extraction | Extract abstract relational structure | | structural-mapping | Map source→target correspondences | | analogy-quality-assessment | Rate analogy depth (surface/structural/systemic) | | transfer-adaptation | Adapt transferred principle to target constraints | | cross-domain-synthesis | Synthesize transfer outputs | ## Execution Guidance 1. **Functionalize target**: Restate target problem in relational terms (not object terms) 2. **Source search**: Use domain-scanning to find domains with similar relational structure 3. **Abstract source**: Extract relational structure from source using abstraction-extraction 4. **Map structure**: Use structural-mapping to align source→target correspondences 5. **Assess depth**: Apply analogy-quality-assessment — only proceed with STRUCTURAL or SYSTEMIC matches 6. **Transfer**: Carry over higher-order relational constraints from source to target 7. **Adapt**: Use transfer-adaptation to fit transferred principles to target constraints 8. **Validate**: Confirm transferred solution respects target domain physics/logic <!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) --> ## Available Tactics Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop. | Tactic | When to use | | --- | --- | | bridge-validation | Validate analogy depth and transfer viability. Ensures only deep structural analogies (not surface-level similarities) proceed to transfer. | | domain-divergence | Scan and select maximally diverse source domains. Ensures creative search covers genuinely unrelated fields with high transfer potential. | ## Available SOPs Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop. | SOP | When to use | | --- | --- | | abstraction-extraction | Extract abstract principles from concrete domain cases. Strips domain-specific details to reveal transferable mechanisms. | | analogy-quality-assessment | Assess analogy depth (surface/structural/systemic). Determines whether an analogy warrants transfer investment. | | cross-domain-synthesis | Synthesize all cross-domain findings into a structured idea report. Integrates outputs from all strategies and SOPs. | | structural-mapping | Map source→target structural correspondences. Identifies corresponding, missing, and extra elements between domains. | | transfer-adaptation | Adapt transferred principle to target problem constraints. Produces concrete adapted solutions from abstract principles. | <!-- END available-tables (generated) -->