git:20260808.7a9ce3e to git:20260831.9985d29

---

name: resolve-findings

description: "Choose an implementation path (direct or plan) for evaluated findings and dispatch it. Direct path applies fixes directly; plan path runs $turboplan. Use after $evaluate-findings has tagged findings and they need to be implemented, or when the user asks to \"resolve findings\", \"apply evaluated findings\", or \"dispatch findings to implementation\"."

---

# Resolve Findings

Choose a path for evaluated findings and run it. Direct path applies fixes directly; plan path runs `$turboplan`.

## Task Tracking

At the start, use `update_plan` to track each step, restating any remaining steps of a parent workflow alongside them:

1. Choose path

2. Run the chosen path

## Step 1: Choose Path

Present a summary of accepted findings (Apply verdict): count by complexity (mechanical fixes vs. architectural or design changes). Then use `request_user_input` to let the user choose:

- **Plan** — Run `$turboplan` for drafting, refinement, approval, implementation, and finalize

Suggest Plan when findings include complex or architectural changes. Suggest Direct when all findings are mechanical fixes.

Add a **Get a second opinion** option whenever the findings would establish a pattern others will follow, change an interface, or commit to a data shape, and whenever neither path earns the suggestion with conviction. It runs the `$consult-claude` skill for which path the findings warrant on technical merit. Then resolve the path with that answer in hand, re-asking when the choice stays the user's.

## Step 2: Run the Chosen Path

Read the reference file for the confirmed path and follow its phases:

- **Direct path** — [references/direct-path.md](references/direct-path.md)

- **Plan path** — [references/plan-path.md](references/plan-path.md)

State the chosen path before continuing with the reference file.

Then call `update_plan` to mark this step completed and continue with the next step of the active workflow.