academic-research · git:20260728.80a7ab6 · 2026-07-28 · sha256 fb42882a7af79753
academic-research git:20260728.80a7ab6A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/fb42882a7af79753.
---
name: academic-research
description: "Research project scaffolding, thesis/dissertation writing, literature reviews, publication workflows, and the AI assistant-assisted academic workflows"
lastReviewed: 2026-04-30
---
# Academic Research
> Complete research lifecycle: project setup, literature review, writing, publication, and defense.
---
## Project Structure
```
research-project/
├── .github/
│ └── copilot-instructions.md # Research context for the AI assistant
├── docs/
│ ├── RESEARCH-PLAN.md # Questions, timeline, milestones
│ ├── METHODOLOGY.md # Design decisions
│ └── DECISION-LOG.md # Key decisions with rationale
├── data/
│ ├── raw/ # Untouched source data
│ ├── processed/ # Cleaned/transformed
│ └── DATA-DICTIONARY.md # Variable definitions
├── analysis/
│ ├── scripts/ # Analysis code
│ └── outputs/ # Figures, tables
├── writing/
│ ├── drafts/ # Work in progress
│ └── submissions/ # Submitted versions
├── references/
│ ├── LITERATURE-MATRIX.md # Systematic tracking
│ └── notes/ # Reading notes
└── README.md
```
### Quick Setup
```bash
mkdir -p .github docs data/{raw,processed} analysis/{scripts,outputs} writing/{drafts,submissions} references/notes
touch docs/RESEARCH-PLAN.md docs/METHODOLOGY.md references/LITERATURE-MATRIX.md .github/copilot-instructions.md
```
---
## Research Project Types
| Type | Duration | Output | Review |
|------|----------|--------|--------|
| Master's Thesis | 1-2 years | 80-150 pages | Committee defense |
| PhD Dissertation | 3-7 years | 150-300+ pages | Committee + external |
| Journal Article | 3-12 months | 5,000-10,000 words | Peer review |
| Conference Paper | 2-6 months | 4,000-8,000 words | Peer review |
---
## Research Question Development
### PICO Framework
- **P**opulation — Who is being studied?
- **I**ntervention — What is being tested?
- **C**omparison — Against what?
- **O**utcome — What is measured?
### FINER Criteria
| Criterion | Question |
|-----------|----------|
| **F**easible | Can it be done with available resources? |
| **I**nteresting | Does anyone care? |
| **N**ovel | Does it add new knowledge? |
| **E**thical | Can it be done ethically? |
| **R**elevant | Does it matter to the field? |
---
## Literature Review
### Synthesis Approaches
| Approach | When to Use |
|----------|-------------|
| **Thematic** | Organize by concepts across sources |
| **Chronological** | Show field evolution |
| **Methodological** | Compare research approaches |
| **Concept Matrix** | Map concepts to sources in table |
### Gap Types
- **Empirical** — No studies in specific context
- **Theoretical** — Theory not applied to domain
- **Methodological** — New methods could reveal insights
- **Population** — Understudied demographic
### Literature Matrix Template
```markdown
| Citation | Year | Method | Findings | Gaps | Relevance |
|----------|------|--------|----------|------|-----------|
| Author1 et al. | 2024 | RCT | X | Y | ⭐⭐⭐ |
```
---
## Methodology
### Qualitative Methods
| Method | Best For | Sample |
|--------|----------|--------|
| Interviews | Deep understanding | 10-30 |
| Focus Groups | Group dynamics | 4-8/group |
| Case Study | Detailed exploration | 1-10 |
| Grounded Theory | Theory generation | Until saturation |
### Quantitative Methods
| Method | Best For | Sample |
|--------|----------|--------|
| Survey | Breadth, generalization | 100-1000+ |
| Experiment | Causation | Power analysis |
| Quasi-experiment | No randomization | Varies |
### Mixed Methods
- **Convergent** — Qual + quant simultaneously
- **Explanatory Sequential** — Quant → Qual
- **Exploratory Sequential** — Qual → Quant
---
## Thesis/Dissertation Structure
1. **Introduction** — Problem, significance, research questions
2. **Literature Review** — Framework, prior work, gaps
3. **Methodology** — Design, collection, analysis
4. **Results** — Data without interpretation
5. **Discussion** — Interpret, connect to literature
6. **Conclusion** — Summary, contributions, limitations
### Discipline Variations
| Discipline | Variation |
|------------|-----------|
| Sciences | Methods-heavy |
| Humanities | Multiple thematic chapters |
| Social Sciences | Separate theoretical framework |
| Engineering | Implementation + Evaluation chapters |
---
## Academic Writing
### Hedging Language
| Strong | Hedged |
|--------|--------|
| "This proves..." | "This suggests..." |
| "Always causes" | "May contribute to" |
| "Definitely shows" | "Evidence indicates" |
### CARS Model (Introductions)
1. **Establish territory** — topic importance
2. **Establish niche** — gap in knowledge
3. **Occupy niche** — your contribution
### Citation Density
| Section | Density |
|---------|---------|
| Abstract | None |
| Introduction | Medium |
| Related Work | High |
| Methods | Low-Medium |
| Results | Low |
| Discussion | Medium |
---
## Publication Workflow
### Venue Selection
| Research Type | Venue |
|---------------|-------|
| User study with metrics | ACM CHI |
| Business implications | Harvard Business Review |
| Cognitive theory | Cognitive Systems Research |
| Philosophical AI argument | Minds & Machines |
### 5-Phase Process
| Phase | Duration | Focus |
|-------|----------|-------|
| Preparation | 1-2 weeks | Literature, outline, figures |
| Rough Draft | 1-2 weeks | Write without editing |
| Revision | 1-2 weeks | Structure → Section → Paragraph → Sentence |
| Feedback | 2-4 weeks | Advisor, peers |
| Polish | 1 week | Format, citations, submit |
### Responding to Reviews
```markdown
## Response to Reviewer 1
### R1.1: "[Concern]"
We appreciate this observation. [How addressed].
Changes: Section X, paragraph Y: [new text]
```
---
## Committee Navigation
### Defense Preparation
1. Anticipate likely questions
2. Prepare 20-30 minute presentation
3. Know your limitations
4. Have backup slides
5. Practice with friendly audience
### Common Concerns
| Concern | Address With |
|---------|--------------|
| "Why this topic?" | Strong motivation |
| "What's your contribution?" | Explicit list |
| "How is this valid?" | Robust methodology |
| "What about X?" | Scope, future work |
---
## Citation Management
| Style | Discipline |
|-------|------------|
| APA 7 | Psychology, social sciences |
| MLA 9 | Humanities |
| Chicago | History |
| IEEE | Engineering, CS |
| Vancouver | Medicine |
---
## Refactoring Existing Projects
### Audit Checklist
- [ ] Has .github/copilot-instructions.md
- [ ] Data separated: raw vs processed
- [ ] Research questions documented
- [ ] Literature systematically tracked
- [ ] Methodology decisions recorded
### Migration Pattern
```bash
git mv old-data.csv data/raw/
git mv cleaned.csv data/processed/
git mv draft.docx writing/drafts/paper-v1.docx
```
---
## File Templates
### RESEARCH-PLAN.md
```markdown
# Research Plan: [Title]
## Research Questions
1. Primary: [Main question]
2. Secondary: [Supporting questions]
## Timeline
| Phase | Duration | Deliverable |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Literature | Weeks 1-4 | Matrix complete |
| Collection | Weeks 5-12 | Raw data |
| Analysis | Weeks 13-16 | Results |
| Writing | Weeks 17-20 | Draft |
```
### copilot-instructions.md (Research)
```markdown
# [Project] - Research Context
## Current Phase
- [x] Literature Review
- [ ] Data Collection
## the AI assistant Guidance
- Add literature to references/LITERATURE-MATRIX.md
- Log decisions in docs/DECISION-LOG.md
- Citation style: APA 7
```
---
## Pre-Submission Checklist
- [ ] Abstract stands alone
- [ ] Contributions stated explicitly
- [ ] All claims supported
- [ ] Limitations acknowledged
- [ ] References complete
- [ ] Word limit respected
- [ ] Anonymized if required
---
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| Zotero | Reference management |
| Overleaf | LaTeX collaboration |
| Connected Papers | Literature discovery |
| Pandoc | Markdown to Word/PDF |
---
## Related Skills
- `literature-review` — Systematic search
- `citation-management` — APA formatting
- `md-to-word` — Document conversion
- `dissertation-defense` — Defense preparation