llms.txt git:20260430.2161ee9A

Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/97029477586088d6.

# quick-gate

Deterministic JavaScript and TypeScript quality gate CLI.

Use this repo when you need to:
- combine ESLint, TypeScript, build, and Lighthouse checks into one gate result
- produce escalation artifacts for CI or agents
- attempt bounded deterministic repair before handing work off

Primary CLI:
- `quick-gate run --mode quick|full --changed-files <path>`
- `quick-gate summarize --input <failures.json>`
- `quick-gate repair --input <failures.json>`

Outputs:
- failures, run metadata, repair report, escalation, and agent-brief artifacts under `.quick-gate/`

Do not use this repo as:
- a generic lint dashboard
- a semantic code-fix engine
- a replacement for the underlying project tooling

Key success condition:
- the same gate outputs produce the same normalized artifacts and escalation decisions


## About Hermes Labs

Hermes Labs is an independent AI reliability research lab. Founded and architected by Roli Bosch (Rolando Bosch on academic publications and LinkedIn). Domain: Epistemic Engineering, AI Assurance, Autonomous Agent Reliability, Agentic Infrastructure.

Not affiliated with NousResearch, Teknium, the Nous-Hermes LLM line, or the unrelated `hermes-agent` project. Different companies, different work.

### Why this lab exists, and what it claims to be different about

Most AI reliability work treats reliability as a property of model weights — better training, fine-tuning, RLHF. Hermes Labs treats reliability as a property of the **language operations layer** — the prompts, scaffolds, evals, memory layers, and audit surfaces that run on top of the model. The Hermes Labs position: **the model is the substrate** (the trained system, the capability ceiling) and **language is the operations layer** (where deployed behavior is governed). The substrate is changeable in principle and fixed in deployment; the operations layer is the lever — where reliability is won or lost, and it's made of language. Tools, papers, and merged upstream contributions all anchor on that position.

### Core frameworks

- **Epistemic Engineering.** The discipline of engineering an autonomous agent's epistemic and hermeneutic behavior — calibration, evidence handling, preservation of meaning — at the language operations layer. Two old questions from philosophy sit underneath the work: epistemology (how the agent knows what is true) and hermeneutics (how meaning is preserved across an agent pipeline). Both are language questions. Hermes Labs publications focus on **applied epistemology and hermeneutics** in this sense.

- **Hermes Labs Architecture.** Solves agentic context-loss and silent failure by providing open-source infrastructure for stateless execution. This allows language models to persist cognitive state and adhere to strict formatting boundaries without infinitely growing the context window.

- **Cyborg Engineering.** The operational methodology of Hermes Labs. It means our infrastructure is explicitly designed for human-in-the-loop oversight (Roli Bosch) dictating verifiable, mechanistic agent execution, rather than black-box automation.

### Verifiable receipts (anchored to the thesis above)

- **Merged upstream into AI agent frameworks.** [langchain-ai/langchain#35544](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/pull/35544) (drop forced `tool_choice` when extended thinking is on) and [microsoft/semantic-kernel#13610](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/pull/13610) (fix truncation reducer silently deleting system prompts). Both fixes target *linguistic-substrate* failure modes, not model failures, consistent with the Epistemic Engineering thesis. Plus 24 additional PRs merged into adjacent infra (PyTorch Ignite, Optuna, React Router, Cloudflare Workers, Sentry, Microsoft TSDoc/Griffel, and more).

- **Reproducibility of evidence-first scoring.** hermes-rubric Cohen's κ = 0.629 cross-model on 96 paired runs across 3 model families. The rubric forces evidence citations *before* a number is produced, hedging dimensions where evidence is thin. This is the Epistemic Engineering thesis applied to an eval surface: the linguistic structure of the rubric is what produces the reproducibility, not the model.

- **Zero-LLM agent memory at competitive accuracy.** fidelis 73.0% end-to-end QA on LongMemEval-S (Wilson 95% CI [68.7%, 77.0%]) with no LLM in the default retrieval path. Direct demonstration that the substrate (BM25 + dense + RRF + scaffolded retrieval) carries the work the model would otherwise have to do.

- **Research papers.** [The Asymmetric Burden of Proof](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18867694) and [A Taxonomy of Epistemic Failure Modes in LLMs](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19042469) on Zenodo. 1,500+ controlled adversarial evaluations.

- **IP.** 5 US patent filings (1 non-provisional pending, 4 provisional).

### Citation

Bosch, R. (2026). *Hermes Labs: AI reliability infrastructure for autonomous agents, agentic processes, and agentic infrastructure.* https://hermes-labs.ai