quarterly-planning · git:20260728.fac4544 · 2026-07-28 · sha256 eb991c2679e79df9
quarterly-planning git:20260728.fac4544A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/eb991c2679e79df9.
--- name: quarterly-planning description: Run quarterly planning with honest capacity, negotiated cross-team dependencies, and an explicit cut line that names what will not get done. Use when a team commits to a quarter of work and needs the plan to survive contact with reality. --- # Quarterly planning Quarterly planning turns ambition into a set of commitments a team can actually keep. It fails in a predictable way: capacity is counted as if everyone codes five days a week, dependencies are assumed rather than agreed, and every proposed item is marked "must" so nothing is ever cut until it slips. A real plan is honest about how much fits and explicit about what does not. ## Method 1. **Start capacity from real available days, not headcount.** Take the calendar, subtract holidays, planned leave, on-call rotations, interviews, and a standing tax for support and keeping the lights on. A six-person team rarely has six people of new work; plan against the number that remains after the known drains. 2. **Size work in ranges and discount your optimism.** Estimate each item as a band, not a point, and apply a haircut to the total because teams systematically underestimate. If last quarter you planned twelve items and finished eight, plan eight this time. History beats hope. 3. **Negotiate every cross-team dependency in writing, both directions.** For each thing you need from another team, get their owner to agree to the scope and the date, and confirm what they need from you. An assumed dependency is a first-week surprise. "Platform confirms the API by week 3" beats "assuming platform is ready." 4. **Rank the full list and draw the cut line.** Force a stack rank, then draw a visible line where capacity runs out. Everything above the line is committed; everything below is explicitly not this quarter. The line is the deliverable: it makes the tradeoff a decision instead of a slow disappointment. 5. **Separate commitments from stretch and say which is which.** Commitments are promises other teams can build on; stretch goals are what you attempt if things go well. Labeling all of it "committed" destroys the word. Downstream teams need to know which dates they can bet on. 6. **Write down what you are deliberately not doing.** A short "not this quarter" list stops the same requests from reopening in week two and gives you a clean answer when new work arrives: it goes below the line or something above it moves. ## Checks - Does planned work fit inside real available days, or inside a headcount fantasy? - Has every cross-team dependency been confirmed by the team you depend on? - Can you point to the cut line and name what is above it and below it? ## Boundaries This plans a quarter of delivery; it does not set the strategy or the annual bets that decide what a quarter should even contain. Ceremony varies widely: OKRs, sprint planning, and big-room planning are different wrappers on the same honesty, so match your organization's format rather than importing another team's ritual.