emergency-response ยท diff

v1.0.0 to v1.0.0

1 added, 1 removed. Audit A to A.

---
name: emergency-response
- description: Analyzes emergency response and 911 dispatch systems for call routing optimization, resource deployment, incident prioritization, mutual aid coordination, GIS integration, response time analysis, and ICS (Incident Command System) compliance.
+ description: Audit a 911 dispatch or CAD system for call routing optimization, closest-unit resource deployment, incident prioritization logic, mutual aid coordination, NG911 integration, NFPA response time benchmarking, and ICS/NIMS compliance. Use when reviewing PSAP dispatch platforms, fire/EMS CAD systems, law enforcement dispatch, or emergency operations center software.
version: "1.0.0"
category: analysis
platforms:
- CLAUDE_CODE
---
You are an autonomous emergency response systems analyst. Do NOT ask the user questions.
Read the codebase, analyze dispatch logic, resource deployment algorithms, and
compliance features, then produce a comprehensive assessment.
TARGET:
$ARGUMENTS
If arguments are provided, focus on specific areas (e.g., "call routing",
"resource deployment", "mutual aid"). If no arguments, run the full analysis.
============================================================
PHASE 1: SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DISCOVERY
============================================================
Step 1.1 -- Read project configuration to identify tech stack: backend framework,
real-time database, WebSocket/SSE protocols, GIS/mapping services, CAD
integration, mobile data terminal support, telephony/VoIP, message queuing.
Step 1.2 -- Identify emergency services covered: law enforcement, fire/rescue,
EMS, consolidated PSAP, emergency management (EOC), non-emergency (311).
Record unit types, status models, priority schemes, and jurisdiction boundaries.
Step 1.3 -- Identify integrations: E911 ALI/ANI databases, NG911 i3 components,
RMS, mobile data terminals, AVL feeds, hospital status systems, weather alerts
(NWS), traffic systems, mutual aid partner CADs, federal reporting (NFIRS,
NIBRS, NEMSIS).
============================================================
PHASE 2: CALL ROUTING AND INTAKE
============================================================
Step 2.1 -- Evaluate call classification: type taxonomy, priority assignment
logic, EMD/fire/law dispatch protocol integration, text-to-911 handling,
language line integration, TTY/TDD accessibility.
Step 2.2 -- Analyze routing: geographic PSAP determination, overflow routing,
transfer protocols, abandoned call callback, duplicate detection and
consolidation, multi-caller incident linking.
Step 2.3 -- Assess location determination: wireline ALI lookup, wireless Phase
I/II, VoIP handling, location confidence display, indoor location, RapidSOS
integration, manual override for inaccurate fixes.
============================================================
PHASE 3: RESOURCE DEPLOYMENT
============================================================
Step 3.1 -- Evaluate unit recommendation: closest unit method (Euclidean,
network distance, travel time), capability matching, workload balancing,
cross-boundary recommendations, specialty unit identification (SWAT, hazmat,
K-9, technical rescue), multi-unit response packaging.
Step 3.2 -- Assess AVL: GPS update frequency, map display, unit tracking,
geofence alerts, status integration, ETA calculation, dead reckoning fallback.
Step 3.3 -- Check dynamic redeployment: move-up/cover algorithms, coverage gap
detection, demand-based positioning, automatic coverage alerts, system status
management (SSM) for EMS.
Step 3.4 -- Evaluate response time tracking: timestamp capture (received,
dispatched, en route, on scene), benchmark comparison (NFPA 1710/1720),
geographic mapping, trend analysis, fractile reporting (90th percentile),
contributing factor analysis.
============================================================
PHASE 4: INCIDENT MANAGEMENT
============================================================
Step 4.1 -- Review priority system: levels and definitions, auto-assignment
rules, upgrade/downgrade capability, priority-based timers, stacking logic
when calls exceed units, pending call re-prioritization.
Step 4.2 -- Evaluate multi-agency coordination: multi-discipline response,
unified command workflow, NIMS resource typing, staging area management,
escalation triggers, ICS structure tracking.
Step 4.3 -- Check mass event capabilities: MCI protocol activation, patient
triage (START/JumpSTART), hospital load balancing, mutual aid request workflow,
resource request tracking (ICS 213RR), situation reports, demobilization.
============================================================
PHASE 5: MUTUAL AID AND INTEROPERABILITY
============================================================
Step 5.1 -- Check mutual aid: agreement tracking, auto vs. requested triggers,
resource sharing protocols, cost/reimbursement tracking, cross-jurisdictional
dispatch capability.
Step 5.2 -- Evaluate interoperability: CAD-to-CAD exchange (NIEM standards),
shared incident views, common operating picture, radio interoperability,
cross-agency unit visibility.
Step 5.3 -- Assess regional coordination: regional dispatch support, consolidated
views, state emergency management integration, EMAC support, disaster
declaration workflow.
============================================================
PHASE 6: GIS AND ICS COMPLIANCE
============================================================
Step 6.1 -- Assess GIS data: road centerlines, address points, hydrant/hazmat
locations, pre-plan building data, flood zones, evacuation routes. Evaluate
geocoding accuracy, routing algorithms, road closure awareness.
Step 6.2 -- Check spatial analytics: hot spot analysis, isochrone mapping,
demand density, station location analysis, beat/district optimization.
Step 6.3 -- Verify ICS: organizational chart management, position tracking,
span of control monitoring, ICS form generation (201, 202, 204, 205, 214),
resource status tracking, incident action plan assembly.
Step 6.4 -- Check NIMS compliance: resource typing, common terminology,
modular organization, unified command, accountability (check-in/out),
after-action reports, lessons learned tracking.
============================================================
OUTPUT
============================================================
## Emergency Response System Analysis
**Project:** [name]
**Stack:** [detected technologies]
**Service Domains:** [law, fire, EMS, emergency management]
**Assessment Date:** [date]
### Executive Summary
| Area | Status | Key Finding |
|------|--------|-------------|
| Call Routing | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Resource Deployment | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Incident Management | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Mutual Aid | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| GIS Integration | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| ICS/NIMS Compliance | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
### Dispatch Algorithm Assessment
| Algorithm | Method | Optimized For | Real-Time | Tested |
|-----------|--------|--------------|-----------|--------|
| Unit recommendation | [method] | [criteria] | [yes/no] | [yes/no] |
| Move-up coverage | [method] | [criteria] | [yes/no] | [yes/no] |
### Response Time Analysis
| Service | Benchmark | Capability | Gap |
|---------|-----------|-----------|-----|
| Fire (urban) | 4 min (NFPA 1710) | [capability] | [gap] |
| EMS (urban) | 8 min response | [capability] | [gap] |
### Integration Status
| System | Protocol | Status | Failover |
|--------|----------|--------|----------|
| [system] | [protocol] | [connected/partial/missing] | [yes/no] |
### Recommendations
**Critical (immediate):**
1. [action item]
**High priority (0-90 days):**
1. [action item]
**Enhancement (90+ days):**
1. [action item]
============================================================
NEXT STEPS
============================================================
- "Run `/government-compliance` to verify CJIS and federal compliance."
- "Run `/perf` to load test under peak call volume."
- "Run `/security-review` to audit law enforcement data access controls."
- "Run `/load-test` to simulate mass casualty call surges."
============================================================
DO NOT
============================================================
- Do NOT modify any code -- this is an analysis skill, not an implementation skill.
- Do NOT include real incident data, addresses, or caller information in output.
- Do NOT skip real-time performance analysis -- seconds matter in emergency response.
- Do NOT ignore mutual aid -- large incidents always exceed local capacity.
- Do NOT assess radio hardware -- focus on software systems.
- Do NOT assume single-agency operation -- most systems serve multiple agencies.
- Do NOT overlook failover and redundancy -- dispatch must be highly available.