ripwire-reuse-first · git:20260905.2395543 · 2026-09-05 · sha256 6a88711a7aa5534d
ripwire-reuse-first git:20260905.2395543A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/6a88711a7aa5534d.
--- name: ripwire-reuse-first description: > About to write ONE symbol — a single function, class, helper, or utility — reuse before you reinvent. Use the moment you're about to author any named thing (even a "quick" one-liner: duplicates are born on tasks that feel too small to tool up for), and before adding a dependency. ripwire finds the existing building block, the repo's best-in-class exemplar to imitate (by ROLE, not text similarity), the duplicate you are about to recreate, and whether the dependency is already in the tree, so you compose instead of reinvent. The least code is the least complexity, the fewest bugs, the smallest review, and the most cache-friendly diff. For a whole multi-symbol FEATURE (plan/interface/sizing) → ripwire-before-you-build. One --exemplar (or --grep) call at most — and if the fix is a one-line edit to an existing symbol, or the ranked output already showed the building block, skip this skill (and this file) and just write it. Backed by ripwire (deterministic, on PATH). allowed-tools: Bash, Read --- # Reuse before you write > Routing — pick the right door: > • Starting a whole FEATURE (multi-symbol, needs a plan / interface / sizing) → **ripwire-before-you-build**. > • The cross-cutting *map-before-you-read* token discipline for any read → **ripwire-efficient**. > • Judging whether what you wrote got better or worse before "done" → **ripwire-quality-bar**. > • Not sure which skill? → **ripwire-router**. The cheapest, simplest, most readable code is the code you don't write. Before authoring anything non-trivial, spend one `ripwire` call (on PATH) to find what already exists. ## Retrieve by ROLE, never by raw similarity This is the load-bearing rule, not a style preference: **similarity-retrieved "here's similar code, paste it" measurably HURTS** — up to **−15% Pass@1** (arXiv:2503.20589). What helps is API/type-signature context (+17-20%) and dependency-graph-structured retrieval (+6 EM; enabled 5/6 multi-file edits vs 0/6 without a graph). ripwire's shape — signatures + call-graph + role-ranked exemplars — is the validated retrieval shape; "find me a similar-looking snippet" is the anti-pattern to avoid, even though it's the tempting first instinct. ## Before you write a function / class / util 1. **Find the building block first** — `ripwire <dir> --for="<what you're about to build>"` → ranked existing signatures (plus, when the code has them, the `<lego>` / `<compose>` HAS-A blocks — what a class already owns). If you can name the helper you suspect exists, query it verbatim (`--for="parseByteSize"`) — `--for` auto-routes to name-exact retrieval and lands it at recall@1 ~99%. It also carries the quality lens (`cx`/`ccx`/`in`/`churn`/`amp`/`tested`) so you see which candidates are safe to extend. Often the thing exists — compose from it. 2. **Optionally get a style/shape exemplar** — if the retrieval result leaves a local-idiom question, `ripwire <dir> --exemplar=fn|method|class|struct|iface|var` (a kind) or `--exemplar="<task in words>"` (the top match's kind is inferred) returns the repo's single best-in-class instance of that shape: highest fan-in, lowest cognitive complexity, `tested=1` where possible — selected by ROLE, **not** text similarity. It returns the full body under `<bodies>`. **Copy its shape (structure, error handling, naming), not its text** — it is a model to imitate, not a relevant-code search. 3. **Find candidates by behavior/shape** — `ripwire <dir> --grep="<a word from the behavior>"`, or a NARROWED graph query: `--graph-query='and(file(all,"<area>"),kind(all,fn))'`. (Bare `kind(all,fn)` is ranked by importance + capped at `--top-k`, so it's safe — but narrowing by `file()`/`name()`/`callers()` finds the *relevant* building block, not just the globally-important one.) → implementations to reuse or extend. 4. **Don't duplicate** — `ripwire <dir> --clones` → if your intended body matches an existing one, call it instead. **Rule of Three:** extract a shared helper on the *third* occurrence, not the second — and prefer a little duplication over the *wrong* abstraction (a helper you bend with boolean flags is worse than two honest copies). ## Before you add a dependency 5. **Is it already here?** — `ripwire <dir> --external-surface` (what the tree already depends on; the default is a 100-row window with the sh builtins dropped and counted as `builtins_excluded=` — `--include-builtins` keeps them) and `--uses=NAME` (the import role). Reuse an in-tree dependency before adding a new one: a new dep is build weight, supply-chain surface, and one more thing every reader must learn — it has to earn its place. 6. **Before adding/vendoring a NEW dependency, map the candidate repo first** — `ripwire <git-url>` (https:// or git@; shallow-clones to a temp cache dir, then maps it like any local tree — `--refetch` forces a fresh clone instead of reusing the cached one). Run `--report`/`--hotspots`/`--deps` on it before you commit to the dependency: is it actually small and well-factored, or a god-file waiting to become your problem? ## When you do write - **Match the local idiom** — `ripwire <dir> --for="<the area>"` shows the surrounding naming, layout, and error-handling style. Mirror it so your diff reads like the file, not like a graft (cache-friendly for the reader and for KV-cache reuse). - **Less code wins on every metric at once:** lower complexity, fewer call edges, smaller blast radius, less to test, less to read. When in doubt, delete a parameter before adding one. Then hand off to **`ripwire-quality-bar`** before you call it done.