v1.0.0 to v1.0.0

+ ---

+ name: crypto-research

+ description: Deep-dive research report on a specific cryptocurrency before trading or investing. Trigger on requests for a structured breakdown of a specific coin or token and verify current market, team, tokenomics, and project facts before responding.

+ version: 1.0.0

+ ---

+

+ # Crypto Research

+

+ ## Intent

+

+ Produce structured cryptocurrency due diligence with source-aware research, risks, tokenomics, listings, and practical caveats.

+

+ ## Do Not Use When

+

+ - Do not use for investment advice, guaranteed returns, trade signals, or unsourced project claims.

+ - Required context is missing and cannot be reasonably inferred.

+ - A more specific skill in this repo is a better match.

+

+ Generate a structured due diligence report on a specific cryptocurrency. This is a research tool for project quality and risk review, not a buy or sell recommendation engine.

+

+ ## Trigger When

+

+ - The user starts with `cr` followed by a coin name or ticker

+ - The user asks for research, due diligence, or a full breakdown of a specific crypto asset

+ - The user asks whether a coin looks credible, risky, overvalued, or worth further review

+

+ Examples:

+

+ ```text

+ cr ONDO

+ cr Solana

+ cr Sui

+ cr ai16z

+ ```

+

+ ## Workflow

+

+ 1. Verify current facts before writing, especially price, supply, listings, team status, and recent news.

+ 2. Gather enough source-backed information for each report section.

+ 3. Mark unverifiable fields as `—` or `Not found` instead of guessing.

+ 4. Write the report in the required format with a mandatory `Red Flags` section.

+ 5. End with a research-only disclaimer and source list.

+

+ ## Research Areas

+

+ Always cover:

+

+ 1. Project overview and differentiators

+ 2. Tokenomics and unlock risk

+ 3. Team and backer credibility

+ 4. Exchange listings and liquidity context

+ 5. Price action and market context

+ 6. Roadmap and development activity

+ 7. Adoption signals and traction metrics

+ 8. Red flags and green flags

+ 9. Summary scorecard

+

+ ## Search Guidance

+

+ Verify current information for:

+

+ - project overview and use case

+ - tokenomics, supply, and vesting schedule

+ - team and founder background

+ - roadmap and milestones

+ - current price and chart context

+ - exchange listings

+ - recent news

+ - risks, criticism, and controversies

+ - audit and security status

+ - market data from sources such as CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap

+

+ If search snippets are insufficient, open direct source pages for cleaner data.

+

+ ## Report Format

+

+ Use this structure:

+

+ ```markdown

+ # [Coin Name] ($TICKER) Research Report

+ *Generated [Month DD, YYYY] | Data as of [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM UTC]*

+

+ ## TL;DR

+

+ ## Project Overview

+

+ ## Tokenomics

+

+ ## Team & Backers

+

+ ## Exchange Listings

+

+ ## Recent Price Action

+

+ ## Roadmap & Development

+

+ ## Use Case & Adoption

+

+ ## Red Flags

+

+ ## Green Flags

+

+ ## Summary Scorecard

+

+ ## Sources

+ ```

+

+ ## Rules

+

+ - Verify current facts before writing

+ - Use reliable and current sources

+ - Never fabricate missing data

+ - Keep language direct and factual

+ - Include a `Red Flags` section every time

+ - Do not provide financial advice

+ - Remove or mark any claim that cannot be sourced

+ - Avoid crypto hype language and marketing copy

+

+ ## Scoring Guidance

+

+ Score these areas qualitatively:

+

+ - project fundamentals

+ - tokenomics

+ - team credibility

+ - exchange liquidity

+ - development activity

+ - overall risk level

+

+ Use the scorecard to summarize quality and risk, not to imply a trading signal.

+

+ ## Validation Checklist

+

+ - [ ] Current price and market data are source-backed

+ - [ ] Tokenomics and unlock risk are addressed

+ - [ ] Team and backers are verified or marked unknown

+ - [ ] Red flags are explicit and not omitted

+ - [ ] Sources are included for all major populated sections

+ - [ ] Output stays research-only and avoids financial advice

+

+ ## Help And Examples

+

+ If the user is not sure how to use this skill, asks what it needs, or asks for examples:

+

+ - Explain in plain language what this skill can do.

+ - Tell the user the minimum input needed for a useful first pass.

+ - Show the example prompts below.

+ - Offer the fastest next prompt the user can send.

+

+ Minimum useful input:

+

+ - A coin or token name and the kind of due diligence you want.

+

+ Example prompts:

+

+ - `Use crypto-research to do due diligence on Solana with risks, catalysts, and red flags.`

+ - `Research this coin and tell me whether the tokenomics and adoption story actually hold up.`

+ - `Show me an example prompt for a full crypto research brief.`

+