rem-page-org · git:20261001.a8a970b · 2026-10-01 · sha256 8d38c74fd04d7839
rem-page-org git:20261001.a8a970bA
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/8d38c74fd04d7839.
--- name: rem-page-org description: What an organisation's page in the notebook is made of — the fixed sections, when a company earns a page at all instead of staying a field on a person's, and the rules that keep it from becoming a second copy of everyone who works there. Composed into every stage that writes one. --- # An organisation's page Why these rules: docs/rem-skills/rem-page-org.md Facts of the entity (programme, agreement, fees, legal entity, who the user deals with) go here, not on the sender's page. ## When an organisation earns a page Create one only when **either** is true: - **Two or more people write from the same work domain.** - **Something is agreed with the entity rather than the person**: a signed contract, recurring money, a programme or account that outlives this contact. A one-person client who signed earns a page; a one-person vendor who sent a quote does not. Otherwise the company stays a `Company:` field on the person's page. A mailbox provider (`gmail.com`) is never an organisation. `co rem scan orgs --days 180` lists domains passing the first test, with `people`, `two_way`, `notices` and `mails` per row. It proposes; you judge. `two_way` (people there who both wrote to the user and were written back to) separates a counterparty from a vendor; read it against the names. - **Brand names that only ever send are a vendor**, whatever the headcount (`Apple Developer`, `Xero Support`); so are event platforms and newsletters. Their mail goes on the page of what it is about (the project using it). - **`two_way` of zero does not settle it**: a reply from the user's other mailbox leaves it at zero. Human names and subjects about the user's own work outweigh it; a brand name does not. - **The user's own domain is not a counterparty.** Pass every own address to the scan with `--mine`. - **One domain can be two tenants** (staff and students, a shared agency address). Choose one page or two from the mail and say which in `Uncertainties`. ## The shape **Every section is always present, in this order**; a section the evidence does not support says `Unknown`. **Every factual sentence carries a claim number** `[n]` into `Sources`. ```markdown # UNSW ## Domains - unsw.edu.au [1] - student.unsw.edu.au — the student body, not staff [4] ## Facts - What they do: public research university [1] - Website: Unknown - Location: Sydney [1] - Legal entity: The University of New South Wales, ABN 57 195 873 179 [7] - Your contacts: [Vern Chan](../people/vern-chan.md) [2] - First contact: 2026-07-10 [1] - Last contact: Unknown ## Who they are Public research university in Sydney. The user deals with two parts of it that do not otherwise touch: UNSW Founders (the startup arm, Unit of Entrepreneurship) and the Office of Global Affairs. [1][3] ## Our relationship Startup partner to the Practice of WorkXStartup programme since July 2026 — the user mentors a student team, UNSW handles administration and academic support. Not a paid engagement; the return is access to the founder network and to students. [2][3] **Where it stands:** one team of 4–6 students agreed after the user pushed back on two or three; sessions requested 3–5 pm; WIL agreement still with Helena. [5][6] ## People here - [Vern Chan](../people/vern-chan.md) — Global Program Manager; the way in, and who reroutes to whoever owns the next step [2] - [Karen da Lapa-Soares](../people/karen-da-lapa-soares.md) — Senior Partnerships Officer; owns the programme's terms [5] - Helena Asher — contract; no page yet [5] ## Terms - Summer 2027 cohort: 11 Jan – 5 Feb 2027, six touchpoints, CBD campus [2] - WIL agreement requested by 17 July 2026; IP/confidentiality arrangements were named as a next step and their outcome is not recorded here [2] ## Open threads - **WIL agreement** — with Helena since 2026-07-21; the user has not signed [5] - **3–5 pm slot** — asked of Natalie 2026-07-21, unanswered in this material [5] ## Uncertainties - Whether the one-team exception was formally accepted, or only discussed. - `student.unsw.edu.au` correspondents are course contacts and may belong to a different relationship entirely; not investigated. ## Sources - [1] Domain of every staff address seen — high — observed 2026-07-10 — outlook:d337e0e0d09c - [2] Programme dates, campus, WIL deadline — high — observed 2026-07-10 — outlook:ec65e5ff6168 ``` ## Rules - **`Facts` is data**: those seven labels, one line each, every one present, a missing value exactly `Unknown`, every value cited, dates `YYYY-MM-DD`. - **`People here` is links, never copies.** A sentence true of the person and not the employer belongs on their page. A named person with no page yet is an unlinked line. - **Once this page exists, the person's `Company:` field links here** and the institutional detail moves off their page; it keeps their role, how they write, what they owe the user. - **`Our relationship` is with the entity**, not the sum of individual ones. - **`Terms` holds the numbers**: rates, dates, notice periods, what was signed and when. A changed term keeps both values and the date it changed. - **Two parts of one organisation that never touch may be two pages.** Say so in `Uncertainties`; split only when the mail shows separate relationships. - **A company's own marketing is not knowledge about it.** Keep what the user learned by dealing with them.