interview-id · git:20260810.7f5bb69 · 2026-08-10 · sha256 eb8ee17099825c44
interview-id git:20260810.7f5bb69A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/eb8ee17099825c44.
--- name: interview-id description: Create structured candidate assessment scorecards and competency interviews tailored for Indonesian workplaces. argument-hint: "<candidate_role> <job_specifications>" risk_level: LOW rule_type: internal-policy --- # Competency & Culture Fit Interview Scorecard Builds structured interview rubrics checking technical skills and workplace cultural alignment (*Integrity, Gotong Royong (Mutual Cooperation), Resilience*). ## Evaluation Metrics (Scale 1-5) 1. **Technical Mastery**: Direct role-based problem-solving capability. 2. **Work Ethic & Integrity**: Honesty in reporting and adherence to company NDA/IP policies. 3. **Collaboration & Teamwork**: Ability to handle interpersonal conflicts and cross-departmental coordination. 4. **Adaptability**: Resilience during operational pivots. ## Scorecard Rules * Each metric is scored 1-5 using **real behavioral examples (STAR)** — not general impressions; structured interviews over impressionistic judgment. * Scale anchors: 1 = no evidence, 3 = partial/situational evidence, 5 = repeated & consistent evidence. * Two separate interviewers score independently → compare and discuss any delta greater than 1 point before finalizing. * Avoid illegal questions: marital status, religion, ethnicity, pregnancy (UU 13/2003 & non-discrimination) — replace them with competency-based questions. ## Scope & Safety * **Use for**: screening, panel interviews, promotion assessments. * **Do not use for**: ongoing performance appraisal (use a separate performance framework), or employment termination (PHK) decisions based on interviews alone. * **Data privacy**: interview records are personal data — store with restricted access; delete failed candidates' records per policy (UU PDP No. 27/2022). ## Worked Example Input: `role: "Admin E-commerce" / specs: ["order management", "CS handling", "basic excel"]` Scorecard: Technical (3.5: e.g., track record of managing 200 orders/day during the pandemic), Integrity (4: honestly reported stock discrepancies), Collaboration (3: CS-logistics conflicts handled via regular meetings), Adaptability (4: completed the migration to a new system within 1 month). Average 3.6 → panel comparison → decision. STAR question: *"Tell me about a time you entered an order incorrectly — what did you do?"*