v1.5.0 to v1.6.0

28 added, 5 removed. Audit A to A.

---

name: unslop-design

- description: Review and redesign an app or website UI to strip out the "slop" (decorative accent color, gradients, glows, noisy badges, emoji as icons, eyeballed spacing, greetings as titles, Title Case, flat hierarchy, repeated numbers) with a system (spacing, type, color roles, elevation) and an orchestrated process: inventory from recordings or screenshots, grayscale pass, parallel product-designer reviewers, a published winning proposal, devs per area, audits and a PR. Covers SwiftUI, Compose and web (dashboards, landing pages, Tailwind), with scripts that scan the code and measure the rendered page. Use it when asked to "review the design", "make it look less AI", "unslop", "polish this screen", "design review", "winning proposal", "audit this dashboard", or when given videos or screenshots of an app or site asking for feedback or a redesign. Also use it to start a design system (spacing, type, palette, shadow scales) or to audit tokens, contrast or consistency across screens.

+ description: Review and redesign an app or website UI to strip out the "slop" (decorative accent color, gradients, glows, noisy badges, emoji as icons, eyeballed spacing, greetings as titles, Title Case, flat hierarchy, repeated numbers) with a system (spacing, type, color roles, elevation) and two modes: a quick five-fix pass for one screen, or an orchestrated process for a whole app (parallel reviewers, a published winning proposal, devs per area, audits, PR). Covers SwiftUI, Compose and web (dashboards, landing pages, Tailwind), with scripts that scan the code, measure the rendered page and score it from 0 to 100. Use it when asked to "review the design", "make it look less AI", "unslop", "polish this screen", "design review", "winning proposal", "audit this dashboard", or when given videos or screenshots of an app or site asking for feedback or a redesign. Also use it to start a design system (spacing, type, palette, shadow scales) or to audit tokens, contrast or consistency across screens.

license: MIT

metadata:

author: marcosnovo

- version: "1.5.0"

+ version: "1.6.0"

homepage: https://github.com/marcosnovo/unslop-design

---

# Unslop design

Three parts: **what to fix** (`checklist.md`, each fix with its reason),

**how to orchestrate it** (`process.md`, rounds with reviewers and devs in

parallel) and **cases and sources** (`references.md`: the before/afters

that shaped this skill and a map of *Refactoring UI*). The spec card every

reviewer fills is in `spec-card.md`. Per-platform notes

(SwiftUI, Compose, web, widgets, watch, car) live in `platforms.md`; websites,

web apps and dashboards have their own playbook in `web.md`. Read the one

you need, not all of them.

- Two scripts measure instead of guessing:

+ Three scripts measure instead of guessing:

- `python3 scripts/slop-scan.py <paths>` — slop patterns in source (web,

SwiftUI, Compose) with file, line and fix number. Standard library only.

- `node scripts/web-audit.mjs <url>` — the rendered page at 390/768/1280 px:

horizontal scroll, a census of every size/color/radius/shadow/spacing in

use, computed contrast, focus states, emoji, glows, plus a grayscale

screenshot. Needs Playwright.

+ - `python3 scripts/unslop-score.py <paths> [--audit report.json]` — both

+ as one number from 0 to 100 with where the points went, plus a README

+ badge. Run it before and after: "score 41 → 88" is the PR's headline.

`examples/dashboard-before.html` and `-after.html` show both on one page.

## Principles (non-negotiable)

1. **A fix is a rule, not a tweak.** Every change ships as a token or

component (spacing, font size, weight, color role, radius, shadow,

button), never as a literal in the view. If the token is missing, create

it in the same change. Pick values **by elimination** within the scale

(try the value and its two neighbors; the middle wins or you repeat),

never pixel by pixel.

2. **Hierarchy before color.** The screen has to work **in grayscale**:

spacing, size, weight and contrast do the work; color comes afterwards and

only to mean something. If it's unclear in gray what matters, color won't

fix it.

3. **The first thing you read is the answer.** One hero number per screen

(the balance, the price, today's progress); everything else steps back.

Emphasize by **de-emphasizing the competition**, not by inflating the

hero. At most one dark/hero surface per screen, and **none in sheets or

modals**.

4. **Color says one thing.** One brand accent for the action or the hero

number; everything else is a role with meaning (money/success, up/danger,

status, reward) and gray for what only navigates. Decorative color =

slop. Color never works alone: shape or a word goes with it.

5. **Measured contrast, not assumed.** WCAG AA (4.5:1 text, 3:1 large text

and icons) computed from the real hex values against the real

backgrounds, light and dark. White on a green/yellow brand color almost

never passes; gray text on a colored background doesn't either (pick a

shade of the same hue).

6. **Nothing the screen can't deliver.** No invented numbers, no projection

presented as data, no implied feature that doesn't exist, no empty state

that lies. Design the smallest version you can actually ship.

7. **One signature gesture, taken from the domain.** A brand detail born

from what the app shows (a price-board price with a smaller last digit,

dot-matrix numerals on a running app), not a new font or effect; and it

degrades gracefully where it doesn't apply. Everything else is native:

don't fight the tab bar, switches or system sheets.

8. **Platforms ship together.** If the project has iOS and Android (or app

and web), the change goes to both in the same PR, in every language.

9. **Verify what the user sees.** Screenshots in light and dark, largest

text size, a non-default currency/language, real data (long names, empty,

2,000 items). What can't be compiled in your environment gets audited by

reading, and the PR says so.

## Any agent (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini…)

The rules are the same everywhere. Where it says "agents", use what your

tool has: subagents if it has them (Claude Code, Codex…), with a git

worktree each for devs. With no subagents, run the reviewers one after another,

each with its own brief, and keep their outputs separate before the jury

step. Where it says "publish", Claude Code publishes an artifact; other agents

write an HTML file the user opens. In a chat app without a codebase, stop

after the before/after proposal.

- ## Working agreement (defaults)

+ ## Quick mode (the default for one screen)

+ One screenshot, one screen or one page, or the user says "quick": no

+ subagents, no jury, one pass you can finish in a few minutes.

+ 1. Measure what you can: `scripts/unslop-score.py` on the screen's code

+ (with `--audit` for a web page). No code: read the screenshot, then look

+ at it desaturated (principle 2).

+ 2. Pick the **five fixes that change the screen most**, each with its

+ `checklist.md` number and one line of why. Hierarchy and spacing before

+ color, color before polish. Say what you would *not* change.

+ 3. Show the before/after: the edited code's render, or an HTML mock of the

+ screen if there's no code, with the filled `spec-card.md` rows it uses.

+ 4. On "yes", apply them as tokens (principle 1), rerun the score and report

+ "score X → Y" and what's still left.

+ Switch to the full flow below when there are several screens or videos,

+ no design system yet, platforms to ship together, or the user asks for a

+ full review.

+ ## Working agreement (full flow)

- Reviewers = *senior product designers* and devs = *senior devs*, as

agents (use the model the user asks for). The orchestrator doesn't build

the areas: it does the shared work, integrates and audits.

- Every decision comes with an **explicit, actionable recommendation**.

- **Before implementing, publish the before/after** and wait for the user's

"yes".

- Every round also reviews what earlier rounds shipped and **all** the

videos/screenshots received, not just the latest.

- When merging is allowed once CI is green: close with a list of what to

check when compiling (concrete risks) and, if there's no Mac/simulator, a

self-contained prompt for a local session.

- On "is everything done?": done (with PRs) · pending on you · left out on

purpose.

- After the last round, update the project's design system.

- ## Short flow

+ ## Full flow

1. Inventory: frames from the videos (`process.md` § 1), screens and

states, and each screen located in the code. Run `scripts/slop-scan.py` on the

UI code and, for the web, `scripts/web-audit.mjs` on each key page.

2. System: check (or create) the spacing, type, color and elevation scales

(`checklist.md` § System). Without scales, reviewers judge by eye; the

audit's census shows which values the page really uses.

3. Grayscale pass + parallel reviewers (3-4, one per area) against

`checklist.md`, applying fixes **one at a time**.

4. Winning proposal: one HTML page with before/after, the spec card and

the list of decisions; the user chooses.

5. Devs per area in isolated worktrees with a closed brief; integrate,

compile, audit, PR, answer review bots, merge when green.

6. Finally: update the project's design system (doc + tokens + its own

skill) with what's new.

## If the project already has its own design skill

Use it for concrete tokens and components; this one brings the method and

the general checklist. If a rule here clashes with a written project

decision, the project wins and the proposal points it out.