grind-review ยท diff
git:20261001.ed53bdb to git:20261003.5ee4059
9 added, 0 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: grind-review
description: "Review one /grind goal's worker output against the goal and correct it by editing. May investigate with read-only gh and web search; never builds, lints or tests."
triggers:
- When the grind workflow reviews a goal's worker output
disable-model-invocation: true
---
<!-- managed-by: clud -->
# /grind-review
Keep tool output bounded (narrow searches, capped lists, ranged reads, bulk on disk, no identical repeats): https://github.com/zackees/clud/blob/main/docs/architecture/bounded-output.md
- Read every file the workers touched and every file they should have
touched. Judge the change against the goal, not the task list; missing
pieces are yours to add.
- Check the RED -> GREEN regression exists for each code change and would
fail without the fix.
- Fix defects directly by editing. Leave no TODOs for the integrator.
- Apply the repository's written rules (CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md, per-directory
READMEs), especially its registries and banned APIs.
- **"Not yet run" is never a reason to reject.** You cannot run anything,
and running tests, lint and builds is the integrator's job: it runs every
check before it pushes. Approve on reading, and list each check the
integrator must run (the focused test, a reproduction, a script) in
`must_verify`. The workflow hands `must_verify` to the integrator.
- Set `approved=false` only for a defect you found by reading and could not
fix by editing, and say exactly what and why. Never reject because nothing
has been run, or because your role can't run tests or lint.
Return the verdict through StructuredOutput.
+ ## Platform coverage selection
+
+ Native PR coverage follows the changed platform implementation: native API/FFI
+ handling, OS branches, adapters/selectors or native runtime contracts. Shared
+ business logic and callers of unchanged platform code use the routine gate.
+ Name the implementation and select only affected targets; target inventories,
+ helper extraction and local coverage gaps do not justify `ci-full` or
+ `ci-windows`. Preserve routine checks and full release validation.
+