grind-review ยท diff
git:20260925.ac82cd6 to git:20260926.1b4dfa8
8 added, 2 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: grind-review
description: "Review one /grind goal's worker output against the goal and correct it by editing. May investigate with read-only gh and web search; never builds, lints or tests."
triggers:
- When the grind workflow reviews a goal's worker output
disable-model-invocation: true
---
<!-- managed-by: clud -->
# /grind-review
- Read every file the workers touched and every file they should have
touched. Judge the change against the goal, not the task list; missing
pieces are yours to add.
- Check the RED -> GREEN regression exists for each code change and would
fail without the fix.
- Fix defects directly by editing. Leave no TODOs for the integrator.
- Apply the repository's written rules (CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md, per-directory
READMEs), especially its registries and banned APIs.
- - Set `approved=false` only when the goal cannot be made correct without
- running something, and say exactly what and why.
+ - **"Not yet run" is never a reason to reject.** You cannot run anything,
+ and running tests, lint and builds is the integrator's job: it runs every
+ check before it pushes. Approve on reading, and list each check the
+ integrator must run (the focused test, a reproduction, a script) in
+ `must_verify`. The workflow hands `must_verify` to the integrator.
+ - Set `approved=false` only for a defect you found by reading and could not
+ fix by editing, and say exactly what and why. Never reject because nothing
+ has been run, or because your role can't run tests or lint.
Return the verdict through StructuredOutput.