verify · git:20260226.ce66352 · 2026-02-26 · sha256 10ac86200d256711
verify git:20260226.ce66352A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/10ac86200d256711.
--- name: verify description: > Use before claiming work is done, fixed, or passing — requires running verification commands and confirming output before any success claim. Prevents false completion claims, unverified assertions, and "should work" statements. --- # Code Forge — Verify Evidence-based completion verification. Run before claiming any work is done. ## When to Use - About to say "tests pass", "build succeeds", "bug is fixed", or "feature is complete" - Before committing, creating a PR, or marking a task as done - After any code change that should be verified - When reviewing sub-agent output before trusting it **Note:** code-forge:impl runs verification automatically. This skill is for general use. ## Iron Law **NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE.** No exceptions. Not "it should work." Not "I just ran it." Not "the agent said it passed." ## Workflow ``` IDENTIFY verification command → RUN fresh → READ full output → VERIFY against claim → CLAIM ``` ## The Gate Every claim must pass through this gate: ``` IDENTIFY → RUN → READ → VERIFY → CLAIM ``` 1. **IDENTIFY** the verification command (test, build, lint, type-check) 2. **RUN** the command fresh (not from memory, not from a previous run) 3. **READ** the complete output (not skimmed, not truncated) 4. **VERIFY** the output matches the claim (zero failures, exit code 0) 5. **ONLY THEN** make the claim ## Forbidden Words These words in a completion claim are red flags — they mean you haven't verified: - "should work" / "should pass" - "probably" / "likely" - "seems to" / "appears to" - "I believe" / "I think" - "based on the changes" - "it worked before" Replace with evidence: "All 34 tests pass (output: 34 passed, 0 failed, exit code 0)." ## Verification Patterns ### Tests ``` Run command → See "X passed, 0 failed" → Claim "all tests pass" ``` NOT: "Tests should pass now" or "I fixed the issue so tests will pass." ### Regression Test ``` Write test → Run (PASS) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore fix → Run (PASS) ``` The revert-and-fail step proves the test actually catches the bug. ### Build ``` Run build → See exit code 0, no errors → Claim "build passes" ``` ### Requirements Checklist ``` For each requirement: [ ] Identified verification method [ ] Ran verification [ ] Evidence recorded ``` NOT: "Tests pass, so the feature is complete." ### Sub-Agent Output ``` Agent claims success → Check VCS diff → Run tests yourself → Verify changes ``` NEVER trust agent reports without independent verification. ## Common Mistakes - Trusting memory of a previous test run instead of running fresh - Reading only the last line of output, missing errors above - Claiming "build passes" after only running tests (or vice versa) - Verifying one aspect but claiming completeness for all aspects - Skipping verification "just this once" because it's a small change