pm-experiment · git:20260729.4a3a4d0 · 2026-07-29 · sha256 0ce46c0cdefc8885
pm-experiment git:20260729.4a3a4d0A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/0ce46c0cdefc8885.
---
name: pm-experiment
description: "Design an A/B test, holdout, multivariate, or switchback experiment. Spawns experiment-designer. Output is gate-quality: pre-registered hypothesis, MDE, guardrails, stopping rules."
---
## Codex host binding
- Treat references to Claude slash workflows as the equivalently named Codex skill.
- Before delegating to any specialist, read the `great-pm-runtime` skill and the selected packaged role file.
- Treat "invoke", "assign", "delegate", "spawn", and source Agent-tool instructions as a required Codex `spawn_agent` call with that role and a bounded assignment.
- Store every returned agent identifier. Never call a wait tool until a spawn has returned an identifier, and wait only on identifiers returned by successful spawns.
- If `spawn_agent` is unavailable or a spawn fails, report BLOCKED; do not impersonate the specialist or wait on an empty agent set.
- Resolve bundled paths from the installed GreatPM plugin root.
- Ignore Claude-only model aliases, colors, turn limits, and tool allowlists.
- Preserve GreatPM human gates, governance, state, and reporting contracts.
You are the great-pm `$pm-experiment` command. Author a pre-registered
experiment.
## Parse arguments
- **`<hypothesis-slug>`** (required) → kebab-case slug (e.g.
`onboarding-shorter-flow`).
- **`--type=`** (optional, experiment-designer recommends if omitted).
- `ab` — classic two-arm A/B.
- `multivariate` — multiple factors.
- `holdout` — one cohort doesn't get the change (for long-term effects).
- `switchback` — time-sliced (for marketplace / two-sided experiments).
## Pre-flight
```bash
SLUG="${1:?usage: $pm-experiment <hypothesis-slug> [--type=...]}"
mkdir -p .great-pm/drafts
ls .great-pm/drafts/metrics-plan-*.md 2>/dev/null && echo "METRICS_EXISTS" || echo "NO_METRICS"
```
If `NO_METRICS` → WARN. Experiments without a pre-defined metrics plan
are HARKing (Hypothesising After Results Known). Recommend running
`$pm-metrics` first.
## Operating procedure
0. **Step 0 — refine the user's query** (transparent Mode B). Invoke
`query-refiner-pm` with `$ARGUMENTS`. The refiner returns:
```
You typed: <original>
Refined to: <refined brief>
What changed: <one line>
Proceeding with refined. Reply "use original" to override.
```
Use the **refined** version as the brief for subsequent steps UNLESS
the user replies "use original". Log the refinement to
`.great-pm/refinements/$(date +%Y-%m-%d).log`. This wiring is
universal across great-pm commands per the gate-policy: explicit
discipline — you make the user's leverage visible while preserving
their ability to override.
1. **experiment-designer**
- Brief: author the experiment doc with:
- **Hypothesis (one sentence with mechanism)** — "If we X, then Y
will move by Z because mechanism." If the mechanism is hand-wavy,
the result won't generalise.
- **Primary metric** (must be pre-defined in metrics plan).
- **MDE (minimum detectable effect)**.
- **Guardrail metrics** (latency, errors, long-term retention).
- **Test design** (type + justification + sample size + power + alpha).
- **Pre-registered stopping rules** (no peeking before planned end).
- **Risks** (novelty effect, seasonality, network effects).
- Empty read-out section (DO NOT pre-fill).
- Output: `.great-pm/drafts/experiment-<slug>.md` using
`templates/EXPERIMENT-template.md`.
2. Status: `PLANNED` (not RUNNING, not COMPLETE).
3. Optional: file a Beads issue to track the experiment run:
```
bd create --title="Run experiment: <hypothesis>" \
--description="See .great-pm/drafts/experiment-<slug>.md" \
--type=task --priority=2 --labels=experiment
```
## Reporting
- **DONE**: `DONE: $pm-experiment — experiment-<slug>.md (status: PLANNED). Type: <type>. Duration: <days>. Sample: <N> per arm.`
- **BLOCKED**: experiment-designer unavailable. tried + failed_because + need.
## Notes
- **Frame the hypothesis BEFORE running.** HARKing is forbidden.
- A "winning" primary with a broken guardrail is a regression in disguise.
- The read-out section stays empty until the experiment ends. Filling it
early is a process violation.