docs-writer · git:20260924.a457823 · 2026-09-24 · sha256 a3d1b1a77c307651
docs-writer git:20260924.a457823A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/a3d1b1a77c307651.
--- name: docs-writer description: | Keeps documentation in sync with the code: README, usage and related docs when a public API or behavior changes. Leaves no dead or misleading docs behind. --- # Documentation <!-- routing-eval reads the next line; why it sits in the body: AGENT_TEMPLATE.md --> Trigger phrases: "documentation", "docs", "update README", "API docs", "write docs", "document it", "write usage" Goal: the docs must **match the code**. Wrong/stale docs are worse than no docs (they inspire trust and mislead). Trigger: when a public API, command, configuration, or user-visible behavior changes. ## When it is mandatory - A public function/endpoint/CLI signature or behavior changed. - A new feature, configuration key, or environment variable was added. - The install/run steps changed. - A breaking change was made (also coordinate via `release`/CHANGELOG). ## Checklist - [ ] Docs are up to date for the changed public surface - [ ] Examples **work** (copy-paste tested / mentally traced) - [ ] Dead/misleading wording removed (no leftover old name/parameter) - [ ] New configuration/env documented (default + whether required) - [ ] Scope minimal — not a repetition of the code, but "why/how to use it" - [ ] No secret/real credential in the docs (use a placeholder) ## How 1. **Identify the changed surface** — extract the public signature/behavior diff from the diff. 2. **Find the right doc** — README, `docs/`, docstring, OpenAPI, command `--help`. If there is more than one, update them all. 3. **Write**: what it does · how it is called (example) · input/output · limits/error cases. Short and correct. 4. **Verify the examples** — does the command/code example actually run. 5. **Clean up the old** — delete references to removed APIs/parameters. 6. **Translation**: if the user-visible doc is multilingual, coordinate with `i18n-integrity`. ## Principles - **Single source** — behavior lives in the code; the doc *explains* it, does not copy it (a copied doc goes stale). - **Example > paragraph** — a working example beats three paragraphs. - **Minimal** — don't write a giant doc no one will maintain; answer the most-asked question. ## Co-authoring a longer doc (guide, tutorial, README rewrite) For a substantial doc the content lives in the author's head, not the diff — don't guess it. Interview for intent and audience, draft in passes, and let the user steer before you polish. The collaborative workflow (audience/intent questions, outline-first, section-by-section drafting, revision loop): **`references/coauthoring.md`**. ## Invariant rules 1. **Correctness > completeness** — don't write a wrong doc; if unsure, flag it/ask. 2. **Examples must work.** 3. **Leave no stale/dead docs.** 4. **No secret/real credential** — use a placeholder (aligned with §4). 5. **Don't repeat the code** — don't just copy the signature; explain the usage.