git:20260926.c2eaeec to git:20260926.d15fe6b

8 added, 3 removed. Audit A to A.

---

name: arch-doctor

description: >

Diagnoses the AI setup and architecture enforcement on this machine: active hooks,

- loaded boundary rules, Maven wrapper, `java` on PATH, and whether every

- docker-compose service is actually running with no foreign container on its ports and

- no image tag disagreeing with the one the test suite pins. Explicit invocation only.

+ loaded boundary rules, Maven wrapper, `java` on PATH, which `.claude/` this project

+ was written from and what has been edited since, and whether every docker-compose

+ service is actually running with no foreign container on its ports and no image tag

+ disagreeing with the one the test suite pins. Explicit invocation only.

disable-model-invocation: true

allowed-tools: Bash, Read

---

## Diagnosis

!`java "${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR:-.}/.claude/hooks/ArchHook.java" doctor 2>&1`

## AI files

!`find "${CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR:-.}/.claude" -maxdepth 2 -type f | sort`

---

Interpret the result above and tell the user, in two or three sentences, whether the

setup is operational. If something is marked with ❌, give the concrete command that

fixes it — don't describe the problem in general terms.

+ The `Provenance` line is the one exception to "give the command": when it lists files

+ edited locally, say which ones and that an update would overwrite them. Don't offer to

+ run the update — losing a hand-edited norm is the user's call, not a fix to apply.

Don't fix anything without the user asking.