bench · git:20260417.880e906 · 2026-04-17 · sha256 4c45eeacfa99e8c4
bench git:20260417.880e906A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/4c45eeacfa99e8c4.
---
name: bench
description: Run embedding benchmarks — R@5 code retrieval, timing, model comparison
disable-model-invocation: false
---
# Embedding Benchmarks
Run retrieval quality and performance benchmarks.
## When to Use
- Evaluating embedding model changes
- Performance regression testing
- Comparing model candidates
- User says "benchmark", "bench", "test embeddings"
## Steps
### Step 1: Check Prerequisites
```bash
# Verify benchmark data exists
ls benchmarks/data/ 2>/dev/null || echo "No benchmark data"
# Verify current model
python -c "from mempalace.embeddings import get_embedder; e=get_embedder(); print(f'Model: {e.model_name}')"
```
### Step 2: Code Retrieval Benchmark
Run the standard code retrieval benchmark:
```bash
python benchmarks/code_retrieval_bench.py --output benchmarks/results_$(date +%Y%m%d).json
```
Metrics collected:
- **R@5**: Recall at 5 (target: >= 0.95)
- **R@10**: Recall at 10 (target: 1.0)
- **Embed time**: Seconds to embed all chunks
- **Query time**: Milliseconds per query
- **Index size**: MB on disk
### Step 3: Category Breakdown
If benchmark supports categories:
| Category | Description |
|----------|-------------|
| architecture | High-level design questions |
| class_lookup | Find specific class definitions |
| cross_file | References spanning multiple files |
| function_lookup | Find specific functions |
### Step 4: Compare Models (optional)
If comparing multiple models:
```bash
# Test each candidate
for model in "all-MiniLM-L6-v2" "all-mpnet-base-v2"; do
MEMPALACE_EMBED_MODEL=$model python benchmarks/code_retrieval_bench.py --output benchmarks/results_${model}_$(date +%Y%m%d).json
done
```
### Step 5: Text Retrieval Gate (if changing models)
Per project policy, any embedding model change must also pass text retrieval benchmarks:
```bash
python benchmarks/text_retrieval_bench.py --dataset longmemeval
```
Target: Match or beat current model on LongMemEval R@5.
## Output Format
```
## Benchmark Results
Model: all-MiniLM-L6-v2
Dataset: mempalace code retrieval (20 queries, N chunks)
| Metric | Value | Target | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|--------|
| R@5 | 0.950 | >= 0.95 | PASS |
| R@10 | 1.000 | 1.0 | PASS |
| Embed time | 15.2s | < 60s | PASS |
| Query time | 15.9ms | < 100ms | PASS |
| Index size | 17.0 MB | < 50 MB | PASS |
Category R@5:
- architecture: 0.800
- class_lookup: 1.000
- cross_file: 1.000
- function_lookup: 1.000
**Verdict: PASS** — Model meets all targets.
```
## Model Comparison Table
When comparing models, produce:
```
| Model | R@5 | R@10 | Embed(s) | Query(ms) | Index(MB) |
|-------|-----|------|----------|-----------|-----------|
| all-MiniLM-L6-v2 | 0.950 | 1.000 | 15.2 | 15.9 | 17.0 |
| all-mpnet-base-v2 | 0.900 | 1.000 | 47.5 | 30.5 | 17.7 |
**Recommendation:** minilm remains default (better R@5, 3x faster).
```