gentle-ai-comment-writer · diff

v1.0 to v1.0

1 added, 1 removed. Audit A to A.

---
name: comment-writer
description: "Write warm, direct collaboration comments. Trigger: PR feedback, issue replies, reviews, Slack messages, or GitHub comments."
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
author: gentleman-programming
version: "1.0"
---
## When to Use
Load this skill whenever you write a comment that another human will read.
Use it for:
- GitHub PR or issue comments.
- Review feedback and requested changes.
- Maintainer replies.
- Slack, Discord, or async project updates.
## Voice Rules
| Rule | Requirement |
|------|-------------|
| Be useful fast | Start with the actionable point. Do not recap the whole PR before feedback. |
| Be warm and direct | Sound like a thoughtful teammate, not a corporate bot. |
| Keep it short | Prefer 1 to 3 short paragraphs or a tight bullet list. |
| Explain why | Give the technical reason when asking for a change. |
| Avoid pile-ons | Comment on the highest-value issue, not every tiny preference. |
- | Match thread language | Write in the thread/user language. If writing in Spanish, use Rioplatense Spanish/voseo: `podés`, `tenés`, `fijate`, `dale`. |
+ | Match thread language | Write in the thread/user language and follow the active persona/tone. Do not force regional Spanish; use voseo only when the active persona or existing thread does. |
| No em dashes | Use commas, periods, or parentheses instead. |
## Comment Formula
```text
<Direct observation or request>
<Why it matters, only if needed>
<Concrete next action>
```
## Examples
### Request change
```markdown
Buenísimo el enfoque. Acá separaría este cambio en otro commit porque mezcla la validación con el wiring de UI.
Eso le baja carga al reviewer y hace que el rollback sea más claro si falla la integración.
```
### Approve with a note
```markdown
Está bien encaminado y el scope se entiende rápido.
Dejo aprobado. Para el próximo PR, agregá el link al anterior y al siguiente así la cadena queda navegable.
```
### Ask for split
```markdown
Este PR supera el presupuesto de 400 líneas cambiadas, así que necesitamos dividirlo o justificar `size:exception`.
Mi sugerencia: primero foundation + tests, después integración, después docs. Así cada review tiene inicio y fin claros.
```
## Commands
```bash
# Inspect a PR before writing review feedback
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json title,body,additions,deletions,changedFiles
```