researching-website-design · git:20260301.2e7e6b3 · 2026-03-01 · sha256 aaeb15bd8e05da84
researching-website-design git:20260301.2e7e6b3A
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/aaeb15bd8e05da84.
--- name: researching-website-design description: Analyzes industry websites for design patterns, layout, typography, and content strategies using first-principles thinking. Use when researching website design, UI patterns, or competitive design analysis. compatibility: Designed for Claude Code metadata: allowed-tools: Read, Write, Glob, Grep, WebSearch, WebFetch argument-hint: [industry-or-topic] --- # Website Design Research **Target**: $ARGUMENTS Analyzes industry websites for design patterns through first-principles thinking. Focus on layout, typography, color, and content presentation. Pair with `auditing-website-accessibility` and `auditing-website-usability` for implementation. ## Core Question "How would users naturally expect this information organized if they had never seen a website?" ## Workflow 1. **Find websites** - Search "[industry] companies/platforms", target 6-8 sites 2. **Extract design elements** - Colors (hex), typography, layout hierarchy, CTAs 3. **Track sources** - URL, authority level (H/M/L), cited research, cross-references 4. **Identify anomalies** - Who breaks conventions with better UX results? 5. **Synthesize findings** - Breakthroughs, patterns, contrarian insights, quick wins ## Output Format ### Source Index ```text 1. [Company] - [URL] - Authority: [H/M/L] Cites: [Studies/sources referenced] Cross-refs: [Shared sources with other sites] ``` ### Design Breakthroughs (Max 3) ```text BREAKTHROUGH #N (Impact: N/100) Pattern: [Specific design element] Principle: [Why it works for users] Opportunity: [How to apply] Sources: [URLs and cited research] ``` ### Visual and Content Patterns ```text COLORS: Primary #HEX [effect], Accent #HEX [effect] TYPOGRAPHY: Headers [font/weight], Body [font/size] HEADLINES: "[Pattern]" - [User psychology] CTAS: "[Button text]" - [Action driver] ``` ### Contrarian Insights ```text Everyone: [Common practice] Reality: [What creates better UX] Evidence: [Sources] ``` ### Quick Wins ```text ELIMINATE: [Element hurting UX] SIMPLIFY: [Over-complex pattern] ADOPT: [Underused effective pattern] ``` ## Rules - Focus exclusively on visual design, layout, typography, and content - Question every design assumption with first-principles thinking - Extract exact values: hex codes, font names, button text - Track cross-references between sites to identify authoritative sources - Keep insights concise and actionable for design implementation ## Further Reading - [Awwwards — Website Design Trends](https://www.awwwards.com/) - [Google Fonts](https://fonts.google.com/) - [Dribbble — Design Inspiration](https://dribbble.com/) - [Smashing Magazine — Web Design](https://www.smashingmagazine.com/category/design/)