git:20260731.e6fdb20 to git:20260907.4a1e3c8

25 added, 0 removed. Audit A to A.

---
name: blender-asset-validation
description: Inspect and validate Blender assets technically and visually. Use for `.blend`, `.glb`, `.gltf`, `.fbx`, or `.obj` quality checks; topology and export review; evaluated triangle/material/hierarchy metrics; standardized multiview renders; fresh-import verification; or evidence-backed review of an agent-generated mesh.
---
# Blender Asset Validation
+ Read [the shared execution guidance](references/astra-workflow.md) once per task
+ for autonomous decisions, evidence cadence, and long-task continuity.
+
Validate both the authored scene and the exported deliverable. A clean export or low triangle count is not proof of visual or functional quality.
## Run deterministic inspection
Prefer the `blender_inspect_asset` MCP tool when available. Otherwise run:
```powershell
$env:BLENDER_EXECUTABLE = "C:\path\to\Blender\blender.exe"
& $env:BLENDER_EXECUTABLE `
--background --factory-startup `
--python "<skill-root>\scripts\inspect_asset.py" -- `
--input "<asset-path>" --output "<output-dir>\metrics.json"
```
Inspect:
- evaluated vertices, edges, polygons, and triangles;
- authored versus evaluated geometry density and refinement modifiers;
- smooth versus flat-shaded polygon ratios;
- UV-bearing meshes, node-based materials, image textures, and authored lights;
- mesh objects, materials, actions, frame ranges, and hierarchy;
- dimensions and world bounds;
- invalid coordinates, degenerate faces, loose elements, boundary and non-manifold edges;
- connected components per mesh;
- non-default transforms and missing material assignments.
Interpret metrics using [references/quality-gates.md](references/quality-gates.md). Do not apply printing-only topology rules to every game asset.
## Render evidence
+
+ The default `presentation: "auto"` selects a studio background using a
+ constant-material luminance hint: dark for bright assets, light for very dark
+ assets, neutral slate otherwise. The CLI equivalent is `--presentation auto`.
+ Use `neutral`, `dark`, or `light` to override. Light power and camera framing
+ scale with asset dimensions; the tool resets authored lighting and grading.
+ Keep a separate authored beauty render when the original lighting is part of
+ the requested result.
+
+ Open the first hero image before accepting the presentation. If material color
+ is washed out, shadows hide the form, or the silhouette merges into the backdrop,
+ rerender with a better preset. Automatic selection is a starting point; it
+ cannot infer texture-driven color, transparent appearance, or art direction.
+ Offer two useful options when they serve different goals, such as dark studio
+ and light catalog. Do not generate all presets routinely. Present a polished
+ hero image first, with multiview evidence available for inspection.
+
+ For benchmarks and before/after repairs, pin the same explicit preset and
+ renderer version across compared assets; do not adapt each condition separately.
+ `evidence.json` records the requested/resolved preset, power, framing, color
+ management, engine, and settings version. Version 2 changes lighting and framing;
+ older evidence must be rerendered before a controlled visual comparison.
Prefer `blender_render_evidence`. Otherwise run `scripts/render_evidence.py` with an output directory. Require:
- perspective hero view;
- front, back, left, right, and top views;
- one contact sheet;
- requested animation critical frames when applicable.
Open the hero and contact sheet with an image-viewing tool. Review:
- silhouette and proportions;
- required parts and spatial relations;
- orientation;
- floating or unsupported elements;
- intersections and accidental gaps;
- material readability;
- visible faceting, razor edges, blockout residue, and missing or broken
textures;
- whether details remain legible at intended scale.
## Verify the exported artifact
1. Export GLB from the authored `.blend`.
2. Start a fresh Blender process.
3. Inspect and render the GLB independently.
4. Compare required names, materials, dimensions, actions, and critical frames with the authored scene.
5. Report authored and re-imported metrics separately.
## Report
Classify each finding as:
- `gate`: invalid or unusable deliverable;
- `defect`: clear request, geometry, presentation, or motion failure;
- `warning`: likely risk requiring review;
- `observation`: neutral measurement;
- `not_applicable`: check intentionally excluded by task semantics.
Include exact evidence paths. Never say an image or video was inspected unless it was actually opened.