git:20260823.094c957 to git:20260825.104c74d

---

name: resolve-diagnostics

description: >-

Resolves IDE diagnostics (inspections and analyzer findings) at the `warning` or higher severity

level for a given set of files, then applies the solution's code style. Use this skill when a

workflow's refactoring step calls for resolving diagnostics, or when the user asks to fix

warnings, inspections, or static analysis findings in specific files.

Typically invoked as `/resolve-diagnostics <PATH>`.

argument-hint: "[file paths]"

license: Unlicense

metadata:

author: Koji Hasegawa

---

Resolves IDE diagnostics at the `warning` or higher severity level for the given files, reformats

them to the solution's code style, then runs the tests.

## Input

One or more file path arguments. Resolve them to a concrete set of files, then:

- Keep only `.cs` files that belong to the current Unity solution — they are the only ones that

carry IDE diagnostics, and `reformat_file` requires solution membership.

- Drop everything else (docs, `.meta`, `.asmdef`, assets, files outside the solution).

- Normalize the remaining paths to project/solution-root-relative form, once, up front —

`lint_files`, `get_file_problems`, and `reformat_file` all expect that form.

If no path argument is given, use `AskUserQuestion` to ask the user for the targets. Do not derive

targets from `git status` — that would silently widen the scope beyond what was requested.

If no files remain after filtering, stop and report that — there is nothing to resolve.

## Workflow

### Step 1: Load the Coding Guide

1. Load the `code-writing-guide` skill — do not rely on automatic skill triggering. Every fix

applied in Step 2 must follow it.

2. Read its `resources/diagnostics-review-feedback.md` now, **before collecting any diagnostics**

in Step 2 — do not wait for its `## Resources` bullet to be reached incidentally; a diagnostic

fix decision must never be made before this file has been read in this run.

Never leave a `warning`-or-higher diagnostic unaddressed — each one is either fixed or explicitly

suppressed per the criteria just read.

### Step 2: Resolve Diagnostics

Resolve diagnostics at the `warning` or higher severity level, collecting them for all resolved

1. `lint_files` — pass every resolved file in one call

- If the call errors, fall back to `get_file_problems`, called once per file

- On a `timedOut` or `more` result, retry the outstanding file(s) with `get_file_problems`

- If a timeout persists, use `AskUserQuestion` to confirm the user is running Rider 2026.2 or

later before retrying further

- Files reported as not analyzed carry into Step 5 as skipped

2. Decide each diagnostic per the criteria read in Step 1, and apply all resulting changes as a

single set per file

- When a fix is a rename (naming-convention inspections) or a symbol removal (unused-member

findings), apply it via `rename_refactoring` / `safe_delete` so references are updated across

the solution

Do not use `mcp__ide__getDiagnostics` (limited to files open in editor tabs) or the Unity compiler

output (does not reflect `.editorconfig` severity settings).

### Step 3: Reformat

Call `reformat_file` once with the full list of files resolved in Input (not one call per file),

passing `rootFolder` as the project/solution root.

### Step 4: Run Tests

If any file was modified in Step 2 — a fix or a suppression — load the `run-tests` skill (do not

rely on automatic skill triggering) and run the tests for the affected assemblies, then confirm they

still pass. Step 3's reformatting alone does not change behavior, so skip this step when Step 2

applied no changes.

### Step 5: Report Suppressions and Known-Issue Items

If any diagnostic was suppressed rather than fixed, list each one for the user together with its

reason. The suppression site itself already carries a "why not" comment per the Step 1 criteria.

Also list any files skipped in Step 2 as not analyzed, together with the reason given.

Also list any diagnostics handled under the Gotchas below, each with the user-verification request

described there.

## Gotchas

Known issues in `lint_files` / `get_file_problems` as of Rider 2026.2.1:

- [RIDER-142275](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RIDER-142275): inspections from ReSharper

plugins are returned with an empty description. Do not guess what such a diagnostic means or

attempt a fix — leave it as is, and in Step 5 ask the user to open the file in the editor and

check what the inspection actually reports (e.g., whether it is a complexity finding).

- [RIDER-142276](https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RIDER-142276): Roslyn analyzer diagnostics

that are already suppressed in source are still reported. Once a `#pragma warning disable` for

the diagnostic is in place, treat it as resolved and move on even if the tools keep reporting

it — do not re-fix or re-suppress. In Step 5, ask the user to confirm the suppression is

effective in the editor.