test-case-writing · git:20260813.b37bfff · 2026-08-13 · sha256 300535c32ae24688
test-case-writing git:20260813.b37bfffA
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/300535c32ae24688.
--- name: test-case-writing description: Use this skill when you need to create high-quality test cases with normal, exception, and boundary scenarios; triggers include test case writing and test design. --- # Test Case Writing (English) **中文版:** See the corresponding Chinese skill. ## When to Use - Need help with test case writing in a real project context. - Need an output that can be used directly for execution, review, or follow-up. - Need to merge scenario candidates from several roles into one traceable test suite without role-based duplication. ## Workflow 1. Read and follow the main prompt listed under Progressive disclosure (coverage, structure, quality bar). 2. Add only project context that changes the result: scope, environment, constraints, risks, dependencies, expected deliverable, and optional role scenario candidates with `source_role`. 3. Identify equivalent candidates by requirement trace, trigger, action, and observable outcome before generating one unified suite. 4. If input is incomplete, return a usable first draft and explicitly mark assumptions and gaps. 5. Default to Markdown; switch formats only when the user asks. ## Core Constraints - Prioritize by risk / business impact — do not treat everything equally. - Separate confirmed facts from current assumptions. - Do not invent endpoints, fields, environments, or root causes the user did not provide. - Keep output executable: concrete scenarios, clear priority, clear next steps. - Do not generate suites per role. Equivalent candidates become one case that lists every contributing `source_role`, requirement/acceptance trace, and risk tag. - Split cases only when differences in trigger, execution method, or observable outcome materially change execution; wording differences never justify duplicates. ## Routing Boundary with the Plus Skill - This Skill remains the lightweight/default authoring path. It can consume already-formed role scenario candidates and unify them with source and requirement traceability. - Choose `testcase-writer-plus` when the task requires conflict and provenance reconciliation across heterogeneous sources, a formal traceability matrix as a standalone deliverable, or higher coverage gates such as positive+negative+boundary coverage for high-risk paths plus data setup and cleanup. Do not switch merely for the base case fields or `Trace` already required here. Keep the two Skills independent; do not merge or rename them. ## Progressive Disclosure - Before producing output, read and follow `prompts/test-case-writing.md` (minimum coverage, output structure, quality bar). - When Excel/CSV/JSON/Word is requested: read `output-formats.md` and honor the format. - When a ready-made template fits: use matching files under `output-templates/`. - For deep framework/troubleshoot/schema notes: read only the relevant file(s) under `references/`, do not load the whole directory. - For format conversion or helper checks: prefer existing `scripts/` over reinventing. - For evaluating/regressing this skill: use `evals/` with skill-up. ## Pre-delivery Checklist - [ ] Followed the main prompt's output structure - [ ] Minimum coverage focus: scope, case priority, preconditions, test data, steps, expected results, positive scenarios, negative scenarios, `source_role`, and requirement traceability ... (details in main prompt) - [ ] Produced one unified suite; merged equivalent role candidates while retaining every contributing role - [ ] Covered the minimum checklist, or explained omissions - [ ] High-risk items have explicit priority - [ ] Did not invent details the user did not provide - [ ] Assumptions and gaps are marked ## Common Pitfalls - Do not pretend completeness when scope/context is missing. - Do not treat every item as equally important. - Do not skip assumptions and information gaps. - Do not copy the same scenario into Product, QA, UI/UX, or Technical suites, and do not drop minority sources during a merge. - Do not dump generic theory unrelated to the current toolchain.