git:20260112.aa93931 to git:20260304.6b3825c

1 added, 1 removed. Audit A to A.

---

name: content-scoring

- description: Score content against GEO optimization criteria. Triggers on "score this", "rate content", "GEO score", "how does this rank", "evaluate content", "content score".

+ description: Score content against the 10 GEO criteria with evidence and prioritized fixes. Use when users ask to score, rate, evaluate, or estimate ranking strength.

---

# Content Scoring Skill

When scoring content for GEO optimization:

## The 10 GEO Criteria

Score each criterion 0-10:

| # | Criterion | What to Look For |

|---|-----------|------------------|

| 1 | **Ranking Emphasis** | "best", "top", "#1", superlatives, leadership claims |

| 2 | **User Intent** | Direct answers, addresses specific needs, solves problems |

| 3 | **Competitive Diff** | Unique advantages, "unlike others", differentiators |

| 4 | **Social Proof** | Stats, testimonials, reviews, customer counts, ratings |

| 5 | **Narrative** | Engaging flow, persuasive language, compelling story |

| 6 | **Authority** | Expert tone, credentials, specific knowledge, confidence |

| 7 | **USPs** | Clear unique value, what makes it special |

| 8 | **Urgency** | Time limits, scarcity, "now", limited availability |

| 9 | **Scannable** | Headers, bullets, short paragraphs, clear structure |

| 10 | **Factual** | Verifiable claims, specific numbers, accurate info |

## Scoring Guide

- **0-2**: Missing or severely lacking

- **3-4**: Present but weak

- **5-6**: Adequate, room for improvement

- **7-8**: Good, minor improvements possible

- **9-10**: Excellent, near optimal

## Output Format

```

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐

│ 📊 GEO CONTENT SCORE │

├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤

│ │

│ OVERALL SCORE: XX/100 │

│ ██████████████████░░░░░░░░░░ XX% │

│ │

│ BREAKDOWN │

│ ───────── │

│ 1. Ranking Emphasis ████████░░ 8/10 │

│ 2. User Intent ██████████ 10/10 │

│ 3. Competitive Diff ████░░░░░░ 4/10 │

│ 4. Social Proof ██░░░░░░░░ 2/10 ⚠️ Priority │

│ 5. Narrative ██████░░░░ 6/10 │

│ 6. Authority ████████░░ 8/10 │

│ 7. USPs ██████░░░░ 6/10 │

│ 8. Urgency ░░░░░░░░░░ 0/10 ⚠️ Priority │

│ 9. Scannable ████████░░ 8/10 │

│ 10. Factual ██████████ 10/10 │

│ │

│ TOP PRIORITIES │

│ ────────────── │

│ 1. Add social proof (+15-20 points potential) │

│ 2. Add urgency signals (+5-10 points potential) │

│ 3. Strengthen competitive differentiation (+8 points) │

│ │

│ EVIDENCE │

│ ──────── │

│ ✓ Good: "industry-leading solution" (ranking emphasis) │

│ ✗ Missing: No customer testimonials (social proof) │

│ ✗ Missing: No time-sensitive offers (urgency) │

│ │

└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

```

## Rules

- Always show evidence from the actual content

- Prioritize improvements by potential impact

- Be specific about what's missing and how to fix it

- Calculate total score as sum of all criteria