mock-quality-review · git:20260915.d1274c9 · 2026-09-15 · sha256 7671365c106a1e70
mock-quality-review git:20260915.d1274c9A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/7671365c106a1e70.
--- name: mock-quality-review description: Use this skill when you need to review mock fidelity, contract alignment, over-mocking, and drift evidence; triggers include mock quality review. --- # Mock Quality Review review whether mocks protect real risks from contracts, mock implementations, interaction assertions, and environment differences. Produce MQR-## findings. This Skill organizes traceable test-double quality candidates only; it does not execute tests or turn a design inventory into coverage, pass, or release evidence. ## When to Use - When you need mock quality review candidates from API or service contracts, mock implementations, stub data, interaction assertions, integration tests, drift records, and real responses. - When you need selection rationale, applicability constraints, evidence gaps, and the smallest validation action. - When inputs are incomplete but a bounded first pass can preserve blocked or unassessed boundaries. Do not use it to execute tests, invent behavior conclusions, replace a complete strategy, or accept risk for a Human. ## How to Use 1. Read prompts/mock-quality-review.md and provide the objective, scope, material, environment, and evidence. 2. Complete the known, missing, conflicting, stale, out_of_scope, and assumptions input audit before findings. 3. Record MQR-## with the subject, preconditions, concern, source evidence, and validation, plus impact/priority, owner role, close condition, and evidence state. 4. Preserve conflicts, unknown constraints, and open questions when evidence is incomplete. ## Core Constraints - Do not execute tests, assume missing rules, versions, thresholds, data, or outcomes, or treat candidate counts as coverage proof. - File presence, names, design declarations, and Eval configuration are not runtime evidence. - Mark unknowns unassessed, blocked, or pending clarification instead of filling them with convention. - Do not edit requirements, code, test assets, or target systems. ## Pre-delivery Check - [ ] Recorded the known, missing, conflicting, stale, out_of_scope, and assumptions input audit. - [ ] Every MQR-## has source, evidence state, impact/priority, owner role, close condition, and validation. - [ ] Facts, inferences, recommendations, unexecuted work, and Human decisions remain separate. - [ ] Findings are not execution results, coverage proof, or release claims. ## Reference Files - Read evals/eval.yaml and matching cases for regression; configuration does not prove project results. - Use evals/trigger-prompts.csv and evals/local-rules.json for trigger checks; missing skill.selection evidence is BLOCKED.