answering-sequence-design · diff
v1.0.0 to v1.0.0
15 added, 14 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: answering-sequence-design
- description: 'SOP: 设计子问题的最优回答顺序'
+ description: 'SOP: Design the optimal answering order for sub-questions'
version: 1.0.0
category: hypothesis-formation
type: sop
campaign: research-question
- input: 子问题列表 + 依赖图
- output: 执行序列 + 理由 + 并行机会
+ input: Sub-question list + dependency graph
+ output: Execution sequence + rationale + parallelization opportunities
dependencies:
skills:
- subagent-spawning
---
# Answering Sequence Design
- 设计子问题的最优回答顺序 — 基于依赖关系和资源效率。
+ Design the optimal answering order for sub-questions — based on dependency relationships and resource efficiency.
## HARD-GATE
<HARD-GATE>
- 输入必须包含: 子问题列表 + 依赖图（来自 dependency-mapping）。
+ Input must contain: sub-question list + dependency graph (from dependency-mapping).
</HARD-GATE>
## Pipeline
- 1. **前置检查**: 依赖图是否无循环
- 2. **拓扑排序**: 基于依赖关系确定基本顺序
- 3. **并行分组**: 识别可同时进行的子问题
- 4. **资源优化**: 考虑资源约束调整顺序
- 5. **风险排序**: 高风险/高不确定性的优先（fail fast）
- 6. **最终序列**: 综合以上因素确定最优序列
- 7. **输出**: 执行序列 + 分阶段计划 + 并行机会
+ 1. **Precondition check**: is the dependency graph acyclic
+ 2. **Topological sort**: determine the basic order based on dependency relationships
+ 3. **Parallel grouping**: identify sub-questions that can proceed simultaneously
+ 4. **Resource optimization**: adjust the order considering resource constraints
+ 5. **Risk ordering**: prioritize high-risk/high-uncertainty items (fail fast)
+ 6. **Final sequence**: determine the optimal sequence by integrating the above factors
+ 7. **Output**: execution sequence + phased plan + parallelization opportunities
## Output Format
```
Phase 1 (parallel): [SQ1, SQ3] — no mutual dependencies
Phase 2 (sequential): [SQ2] — depends on SQ1
Phase 3 (parallel): [SQ4, SQ5] — depend on SQ2
- Rationale: [为什么这个顺序最优]
- Risk note: [哪些子问题如果失败会影响后续]
+ Rationale: [why this order is optimal]
+ Risk note: [which sub-questions, if they fail, will affect subsequent ones]
```
+ </output>