tokenomics-evaluation · git:20260501.87cefc9 · 2026-05-01 · sha256 0735e861b835445b
tokenomics-evaluation git:20260501.87cefc9A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/0735e861b835445b.
--- name: tokenomics-evaluation description: Evaluate token economic models by analyzing supply mechanics, distribution, utility, value accrual mechanisms, and emission schedules to assess long-term token value sustainability. license: MIT metadata: category: analysis difficulty: advanced author: sperax-team tags: [analysis, tokenomics, supply, distribution, valuation] --- # Tokenomics Evaluation ## When to use this skill Use when the user asks about: - Evaluating a token's economic model - Understanding token supply and emission schedules - Assessing whether tokenomics support long-term value - Comparing tokenomics across competing projects - Identifying tokenomics red flags before investing ## Evaluation Framework ### 1. Supply Structure Map the complete supply picture: - **Max supply**: Is there a hard cap or infinite supply? - **Total supply**: All tokens created to date - **Circulating supply**: Tokens currently in the market - **Supply ratio**: Circulating / Total — low ratio means significant future dilution - **Emission schedule**: Plot supply over 1, 2, 5 years - **Inflation rate**: Annual percentage increase in circulating supply - **Burn mechanisms**: Any deflationary counters to emissions? ### 2. Distribution Analysis Assess how tokens are allocated: | Category | Percentage | Vesting | Concern Level | |----------|-----------|---------|---------------| | Team | X% | Y months cliff + Z vest | Normal: 15-20% | | Investors (seed/private) | X% | Y months cliff + Z vest | Normal: 15-25% | | Community/Ecosystem | X% | Ongoing distribution | Normal: 30-50% | | Treasury | X% | Governance-controlled | Normal: 10-20% | | Public sale | X% | Usually unlocked | Normal: 5-15% | Red flags: - Team + investors > 50% of total supply - Short vesting (< 12 months cliff) - Large immediate unlock events approaching - Single wallet holding > 10% of circulating supply (non-exchange) ### 3. Vesting and Unlock Schedule Create a timeline of major unlock events: - **Past unlocks**: How has the market reacted to previous unlocks? - **Upcoming unlocks**: Next 3, 6, 12 months — amounts and recipients - **Cliff events**: Large one-time unlocks vs gradual linear vesting - **Sell pressure estimation**: Assume 20-50% of unlocked investor tokens get sold within 30 days - **Critical dates**: Flag any unlock representing > 5% of circulating supply ### 4. Token Utility Assessment Evaluate what the token actually does: - **Governance**: Does holding grant meaningful voting power? - **Fee payment**: Is the token required for protocol usage? Or optional? - **Staking**: What incentive exists to stake? Staking rate? - **Collateral**: Can it be used as collateral in DeFi? - **Access/membership**: Does it unlock features or tiers? - **Utility depth score**: How many genuine use cases generate organic demand? ### 5. Value Accrual Analysis Determine how protocol success translates to token value: - **Revenue to holders**: Fee-sharing, buyback-and-burn, or ve-model? - **Revenue data**: Actual protocol revenue (30d, 90d, annualized) - **P/E or P/S ratio**: Market cap / annualized revenue — compare to peers - **Token sink strength**: How much net buying pressure does the mechanism create? - **Reflexivity risk**: Does the token's value depend on its own price? (circular incentives) ### 6. Comparative Tokenomics Compare against category peers: | Metric | This Token | Peer A | Peer B | |--------|-----------|--------|--------| | FDV / Market Cap ratio | | | | | Annual inflation | | | | | Staking yield | | | | | Revenue / FDV | | | | | Team allocation | | | | | Community allocation | | | | ### 7. Tokenomics Scoring Rate each dimension on a 1-5 scale: - **Supply design**: Predictable, capped, with healthy emission curve - **Distribution fairness**: Wide distribution, reasonable team allocation - **Utility strength**: Multiple genuine use cases driving demand - **Value accrual**: Clear path from protocol revenue to token value - **Vesting structure**: Long cliffs, gradual unlock, aligned incentives ### 8. Output Format - **Token**: Name, ticker, chain - **Tokenomics grade**: A / B / C / D / F - **Key strength**: Single best aspect of the tokenomics - **Key risk**: Single biggest tokenomics concern - **Upcoming catalysts**: Unlock events or tokenomics changes in next 90 days - **Inflation outlook**: Current and projected annual inflation - **Value accrual**: Strong / Moderate / Weak / None - **Verdict**: Tokenomics support investment / Neutral / Tokenomics are a headwind