paperlab_scientific_traceability_audit · git:20260626.bbe4068 · 2026-06-26 · sha256 debf34c6d45af176
paperlab_scientific_traceability_audit git:20260626.bbe4068A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/debf34c6d45af176.
--- name: paperlab_scientific_traceability_audit description: | Audit PaperLab books for claim, figure, equation, notebook, citation, and unit traceability. Use when a book must become scientifically defensible and reproducible, especially for NeqSim-backed quantitative chapters. --- # PaperLab Scientific Traceability Audit ## When to Use USE WHEN: a textbook chapter contains numbers, equations, figures, tables, or engineering recommendations that depend on calculations, simulations, standards, or source documents. This skill turns technical content into auditable content. Pair with: - `neqsim_in_writing` for NeqSim claim markers, - `neqsim-notebook-patterns` for executable notebooks, - `neqsim-regression-baselines` for stable examples, - `neqsim_standard_requirement_extraction` for clause-level standards evidence. ## Traceability Objects Track six object types: | Object | Required Evidence | |--------|-------------------| | Numeric claim | notebook cell, test, baseline, source table, or citation | | Figure | source file, notebook, generated script, or approved source document | | Equation | symbol definitions, units, source citation, and implementation link if used by NeqSim | | Table | data source, units, and update path | | Standard statement | standard code, revision, clause or paraphrased requirement | | Recommendation | preceding evidence that supports the action | ## Marker Rules Use existing `neqsim_in_writing` markers for high-value NeqSim-backed content: ```markdown <!-- @neqsim:claim test: src/test/java/neqsim/book/<book_slug>/<TestName>.java baseline: src/test/resources/baselines/book/<book_slug>/<baseline>.json --> ``` ```markdown <!-- @neqsim:figure source=notebooks/<notebook>.ipynb cell=<cell-id-or-index> --> ``` ```markdown <!-- @neqsim:eq method=neqsim.package.ClassName#methodName --> ``` Do not mark every sentence. Prioritize values and equations that students will reuse, cite, or compare in exercises. ## Audit Workflow 1. Run `book-skill-stack-plan` and inspect traceability dimensions. 2. Run `book-evidence-check` and `book-figure-dossier`. 3. For each core chapter, identify the top 3 to 5 numerical or equation-based claims that deserve markers. 4. Confirm every cited notebook exists and has executed output or generated figures. 5. Confirm units in prose, tables, and figures match `nomenclature.yaml`. 6. For standards-heavy chapters, add clause-level or paraphrased evidence rather than broad standard names. ## Pass Criteria A chapter is traceability-ready when: - every main figure has source provenance and a discussion block, - the most important numerical claims have markers or explicit citations, - all equations define symbols and cite origin or implementation, - SI units are present in tables and figure axes, - worked examples have notebooks or tests that can be rerun, - recommendations are supported by nearby evidence. ## Output Pattern ```markdown ## Scientific Traceability Audit: <chapter> - Status: ready | needs-markers | needs-validation | blocked - High-value claims needing markers: - <claim and location> - Figures needing stronger provenance: - <figure> - Equations needing source or implementation link: - <equation> - Unit inconsistencies: - <quantity> - Recommended next edit: <one concrete action> ``` ## Safety Rules - Never invent a notebook, test, citation, or standards clause. - If evidence is missing, mark the claim as unverified or lower confidence. - Do not claim regulatory compliance from a candidate standards map alone. - Keep private source filenames out of public outputs unless approved.