implement · git:20260903.10f0277 · 2026-09-03 · sha256 2f890ac24b45f010
implement git:20260903.10f0277A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/2f890ac24b45f010.
--- name: implement description: 'Execute one bounded RED to GREEN experiment from bead or caller intent; return derived subject identity and check facts. Triggers: "implement", "implement this bead", "run the experiment". Full plan-to-validation requests route to rpi.' practices: - tdd - refactoring - small-batch-flow hexagonal_role: driving-adapter consumes: [] produces: - subject-manifest.v1 output_contract: 'subject-manifest.v1 digest, author context ID, and exact acceptance-check receipts returned through the response or runtime channel' context_rel: - kind: customer-of with: plan skill_api_version: 1 user-invocable: true metadata: graph_root: true tier: execution dependencies: [] capabilities: [execute_one_experiment, collect_factual_evidence] effects: [modify_declared_subject, derive_subject_manifest] canonical_status: canonical disposition: keep --- # Implement Execute exactly one bounded experiment described by the resolved bead or caller intent. Implement owns subject edits and factual evidence; the runtime derives identity and receipts. ## Prompt ```text Implement bead ag-1234 from its text: acceptance "ao gate check lists skill.probe-coverage", scope cli/internal/gates/** plus regen outputs, first check `cd cli && go test ./internal/gates/...`. RED first, smallest change, return the manifest digest and check receipts, stop. ``` ## It's working if - The first transcript command is the acceptance check, and its output shows the expected failure (or a green baseline for a relocation or refactor). - Every path in `git diff --stat` falls inside the declared scope; an outside consumer is reported as `file:line`, not absorbed. - The response carries the `subject-manifest.v1` digest, author context ID, and verbatim check output; no `git commit` or `git push` appears. ## Workflow 1. Read the intent, acceptance, and scope from their existing source; before the first write, read `boundaries.md` in the rpi skill's `references` directory for what Implement does not own. 2. Run the declared first acceptance check before changing behavior. RED-first applies when acceptance is behavioral: preserve evidence that the check fails for the expected missing behavior. Relocations, doc merges, and pure refactors record an honest green pre-change baseline instead. 3. Make the smallest in-scope change that satisfies the active behavior. 4. Run the targeted acceptance checks and capture factual results. 5. Refactor only while those checks stay green. Refactoring does not change the acceptance test. 6. Have the runtime derive actual changed paths and `subject-manifest.v1` from the before/after subject. 7. Return the manifest digest, author context ID, and exact check receipts in the response or runtime channel. Stop. Specialists (standards, domain, test, refactor, security) advise only. During edits, run the smallest deterministic checks that can falsify the change, reuse exact-input receipts whose subject and tool identity still match, and run the full suite at the integration boundary unless the intent makes it the first check. ## Scope conflict rule On discovering a live consumer of the change outside the declared write scope (a test asserting the old path, a generated twin, a gate reading the moved file), stop and report the exact file and line to the caller, who may revise the intent and start a separate invocation; a different acceptance contract is a new intent. Before declaring GREEN, self-audit the diff for mocks, placeholders, TODO stubs, hardcoded fixture values, weakened assertions, regenerated goldens, widened tolerances, suppression directives, or specification edits standing in for real behavior. A changed test, gate, fixture, golden, or acceptance source must be required by the original intent, with green coming from the implemented behavior; a check that passes against a substitute or weakened oracle is not evidence: finish the behavior or report it as not built. ## Boundary Do not commit, push, claim, close, release, land, reserve, retry, or invoke a semantic validator. A failed check is evidence for the caller, not permission to create a packet or validation loop.