create-pr · v1.2 · 2026-08-23 · sha256 da29b2b9b10d289b
create-pr v1.2A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/da29b2b9b10d289b.
---
name: create-pr
description: "Use when asked to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review. Handles branch verification, change analysis, title and description generation, and gh pr create. Do NOT use for committing, pushing without PR, or reviewing existing PRs"
metadata:
author: Serghei Iakovlev
version: "1.2"
category: vcs
---
# Creating a Pull Request
## Workflow
### Step 1: Verify branch state
```bash
CURRENT=$(git branch --show-current)
DEFAULT=$(gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name')
```
- If `$CURRENT` equals `$DEFAULT` or is `develop`/`release/*`/`hotfix/*`: inform user they are on a protected branch, cannot create PR from here
- If uncommitted changes exist: commit first (use git-commit skill)
- If branch not pushed: `git push -u origin $CURRENT`
### Step 2: Analyze changes
```bash
DEFAULT=$(gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name')
git log --format="%s%n%b" "$DEFAULT..HEAD"
git diff --name-only "$DEFAULT..HEAD"
git diff --stat "$DEFAULT..HEAD"
```
From the diff and commits, identify:
- **Type**: primary change type (feat, fix, refactor, chore, perf)
- **Intent**: business/technical goal (1-2 sentences)
- **Entry point**: most critical changed file for reviewer
- **Sensitive areas**: files needing extra scrutiny (auth, payments, data)
- **Breaking changes**: `!` in commits or BREAKING CHANGE footer
- **Migrations**: database or schema changes
### Step 3: Generate title
Conventional Commits format: `<type>[scope]: <description>`
- Imperative mood, under 72 chars, no period, English only
- Match the project's commit style (check `git log --format="%s" -20`)
NEVER add task ID, issue number, or other metadata to the title:
**❌ Wrong:**
```
feat(messages): add server-only synthetic mailbox archive parser (BP-1234)
```
**✅ Correct:**
```
feat(messages): add server-only synthetic mailbox archive parser
```
### Step 4: Generate description
Use the template from `assets/pull_request_template.md`. Three sections:
1. **Scope & Context** - Type, Intent, Related Issues
2. **Reviewer Guide** - Complexity (Low/Medium/High), Entry Point, Sensitive Areas
3. **Risk Assessment** - Breaking Changes, Migrations/State
Formatting rules:
- No fluff intros ("This PR updates...")
- Filenames in backticks: \`path/to/file.ts\`
- Use " - " (hyphen), not "-" (em-dash)
- No hard-wrap in body prose: GitHub renders soft line breaks as `<br>` in PR descriptions, so wrapping at ~80 chars creates visible artificial breaks. Let paragraphs flow; break only for new paragraphs, list items, or code blocks
- All sections required, sub-sections only when relevant data exists
Do NOT reference specifications (`./specs/*.md`), plans (`./plans/*.md`), its section numbers, or `TODO.md` in pull request descriptions. These are internal artifacts for agent coordination and should not be exposed to human reviewers. If you need to explain a design decision, implementation detail, or rationale, do so in the description without citing internal documents. The description should be self-contained and understandable on its own.
**Verify every claim about repository state before writing it.** A diff supports claims about the *change*; it supports nothing about the *environment* the change lands in. The diff shows a workflow referencing `CICDBOT_TOKEN` - it says nothing about whether that secret exists. Writing "requires `CICDBOT_TOKEN` to be configured" silently promotes a reference into a missing prerequisite, and the reviewer goes chasing a risk that is not there.
Confirm with a command, or do not assert. When a check is unavailable, address the reviewer instead: "Confirm `CICDBOT_TOKEN` is set for this repo" is useful; "requires `CICDBOT_TOKEN`" is a guess wearing a warning's clothes.
| Claim | Check before writing it |
| ----- | ----------------------- |
| A secret or variable exists | `gh secret list`, `gh variable list` |
| A branch rule or required status check is in force | `gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/rulesets` |
| A person, bot, or team has access | `gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/collaborators` |
| A repository setting or feature is enabled | `gh api repos/{owner}/{repo} --jq '.<field>'` |
| An external action, workflow, or tag is reachable | `gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}` |
This governs every section, not only Risk Assessment. An unverified line under "Sensitive Areas" costs the reviewer the same time.
Complexity guide:
| Level | Criteria |
| ------ | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| Low | Single file, config, docs, simple fix |
| Medium | Multiple related files, new feature with tests |
| High | Cross-cutting, migrations, breaking changes, security |
### Step 5: Create PR
```bash
DEFAULT=$(gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name')
gh pr create \
--title '<title>' \
--body '<description>' \
--base "$DEFAULT"
```
For drafts, add `--draft`.
MANDATORY: Use single quotes for `--body` to avoid shell interpolation. **NEVER** use double quotes, which can cause variables or special characters in the description to be misinterpreted by the shell.
### Step 6: Verify
```bash
gh pr view --web
```
Report: PR number, URL, title, base/head branches.
## Error Recovery
| Error | Fix |
| ----------------------------- | --------------------------------------- |
| "pull request already exists" | `gh pr view` to see existing |
| "no commits between" | Verify branch has commits ahead of base |
| Auth failure | `gh auth login --web` |