git:20260520.ca51455 to git:20260714.6bf9b5e
18 added, 1 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: quality-engineering-quality-assurance
- description: Write manual test cases with 1-condition-per-TC granularity, Module_Action on Screen when Condition naming, platform prefix rules, and High/Normal/Low priority classification. Use when writing or reviewing manual test cases for Zephyr — to split compound TCs, fix naming violations, assign correct platform tags, or determine bug priority.
+ description: Write or review manual Zephyr test cases with 1-condition-per-TC granularity, Module_Action on Screen when Condition naming, platform prefix rules, and High/Normal/Low priority classification. Use for test-case authoring and review; defer Jira traceability, linking, and pushing cases to Zephyr.
metadata:
triggers:
keywords:
- test case
- manual test
- zephyr
- test scenario
- naming convention
- acceptance criteria
---
# Quality Assurance Standards
## **Priority: P1 (HIGH)**
## 1. Test Case Granularity
- **1 Test Case = 1 Condition on 1 Screen**.
- **Split Screens**: "Order Details" & "Item Details" separate.
- **Split Conditions**: "Config " & "Config B" separate.
- **No "OR" Logic**: Each TC must test single, distinct path.
## 2. Naming Convention
- **Pattern**: `Platform_Module_Action on Screen when Condition` (e.g., `Web_Order_Verify...` or `Mobile_Order_Verify...`)
- **Rule**: Only include `Web_` or `Mobile_` prefix if requirement exclusive to one platform. Omit prefix if it supports **Both**.
- **Example**: `Order_Verify payment term on Item Details when Toggle is OFF` (Supports Both)
## 3. Priority Levels
Use priority rationale to justify each classification:
- High: Critical path, blocker bug.
- Normal: Standard validation, edge case.
- Low: Cosmetic, minor improvement.
## 4. References
- [Detailed Examples](references/test_case_standards.md)
## Anti-Patterns
- **No Broad TCs**: `"Verify order flow works"` — too broad; every TC must cover exactly 1 condition on 1 screen
- **No Shared TCs (Divergent)**: Testing Web and Mobile behavior in single TC when behavior diverges — split into separate TCs per platform
- **No Incomplete Naming**: `Order_Verify page` — name must follow full pattern: `Module_Action on Screen when Condition`
- **No Priority Inflation**: Marking cosmetic spacing bug as High priority — reserve High for critical path blockers only
+
+ ## Review wording
+
+ - Call out naming violations explicitly when a test case breaks the naming convention, then split it into separate TCs with one condition on one screen.
+
+ ## Canonical response anchors
+
+ When this skill applies, preserve the following domain terminology or equivalent concrete examples in the answer when relevant:
+ - naming violations
+ - 1 Test Case = 1 Condition
+ - High: Critical path
+ - Low: Cosmetic
+ - Module_Action on Screen when Condition
+ - No "OR" Logic
+ - Split into separate TCs
+ - priority rationale
+