triage · diff
git:20260731.bfdaef8 to git:20260806.5bfe60b
55 added, 55 removed. Audit A to A.
---
name: triage
- description: Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles — categorise, verify, grill if needed, and write agent-ready briefs.
+ description: 讓 issues 與外部 PR 穿過分診角色的狀態機——分類、驗證、視需要 grill,並撰寫可供代理使用的簡報。
disable-model-invocation: true
---
- # Triage
+ # 分診
- Move issues on the project issue tracker through a small state machine of triage roles.
+ 在專案 Issue 追蹤器上,讓 issues 穿過由分診角色構成的小型狀態機。
- If this repo treats external pull requests as a request surface (see the issue-tracker config), triage covers them too: **a PR is an issue with attached code** — same roles, same states, same machine, with a few deltas marked "for a PR" below. Resolve a bare `#42` to an issue or PR per the tracker config.
+ 如果這個 repo 把外部 pull requests 視為請求介面(見 issue-tracker 設定),分診也涵蓋它們:**PR 就是附帶程式碼的 issue**——相同的角色、相同的狀態、相同的機器,只有下面標註「for a PR」的幾處差異。依追蹤器設定,把孤伶伶的 `#42` 解析成 issue 或 PR。
- Every comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage **must** start with this disclaimer:
+ 分診期間貼到 Issue 追蹤器上的每一則評論或 issue,都**必須**以此免責聲明開頭:
```
> *This was generated by AI during triage.*
```
- ## Reference docs
+ ## 參考文件
- - [AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md) — how to write durable agent briefs
- - [OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md) — how the `.out-of-scope/` knowledge base works
+ - [AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md) — 如何撰寫耐用的代理簡報
+ - [OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md) — `.out-of-scope/` 知識庫如何運作
- ## Roles
+ ## 角色
- Two **category** roles:
+ 兩個**類別**角色:
- - `bug` — something is broken
- - `enhancement` — new feature or improvement
+ - `bug` — 有東西壞了
+ - `enhancement` — 新功能或改善
- Five **state** roles:
+ 五個**狀態**角色:
- - `needs-triage` — maintainer needs to evaluate
- - `needs-info` — waiting on reporter for more information
- - `ready-for-agent` — fully specified, ready for an AFK agent
- - `ready-for-human` — needs human implementation
- - `wontfix` — will not be actioned
+ - `needs-triage` — 需要維護者評估
+ - `needs-info` — 等待報告人提供更多資訊
+ - `ready-for-agent` — 規格完整,可供 AFK 代理使用
+ - `ready-for-human` — 需要人類實作
+ - `wontfix` — 不會處理
- For a PR, the same states read against the attached code: `ready-for-agent` means a brief is attached and an agent should take the next step on the diff; `ready-for-human` means it's ready for a human to merge.
+ 對 PR 而言,相同的狀態要對照附帶的程式碼來解讀:`ready-for-agent` 表示已附上簡報,代理應該在 diff 上採取下一步;`ready-for-human` 表示已準備好由人類合併。
- Every triaged issue should carry exactly one category role and one state role. If state roles conflict, flag it and ask the maintainer before doing anything else.
+ 每個已分診的 issue 都應該正好帶一個類別角色和一個狀態角色。如果狀態角色互相衝突,先標註出來並詢問維護者,再做任何其他事。
- These are canonical role names — the actual label strings used in the issue tracker may differ. The mapping should have been provided to you - run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` if not.
+ 這些是正式的角色名稱——Issue 追蹤器實際使用的標籤字串可能不同。這個對應關係應該已經提供給你——如果沒有,執行 `/setup-matt-pocock-skills`。
- State transitions: an unlabeled issue normally goes to `needs-triage` first; from there it moves to `needs-info`, `ready-for-agent`, `ready-for-human`, or `wontfix`. `needs-info` returns to `needs-triage` once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any time — flag transitions that look unusual and ask before proceeding.
+ 狀態轉移:未加標籤的 issue 通常先進入 `needs-triage`;從那裡移到 `needs-info`、`ready-for-agent`、`ready-for-human` 或 `wontfix`。一旦報告人回覆,`needs-info` 就會回到 `needs-triage`。維護者隨時可以推翻——把看起來不尋常的轉移標註出來,並在繼續前詢問。
- ## Invocation
+ ## 叫用
- The maintainer invokes `/triage` and describes what they want in natural language. Interpret the request and act. Examples:
+ 維護者叫用 `/triage` 並以自然語言描述他們想要什麼。解讀請求並採取行動。例如:
- - "Show me anything that needs my attention"
- - "Let's look at #42" (issue or PR)
- - "Move #42 to ready-for-agent"
- - "What's ready for agents to pick up?"
+ - 「讓我看任何需要我注意的內容」
+ - 「我們來看一下 #42」(issue 或 PR)
+ - 「把 #42 移到 ready-for-agent」
+ - 「有哪些是代理可以接手的?」
- ## Show what needs attention
+ ## 顯示需要關注的內容
- Query the issue tracker and present three buckets, oldest first:
+ 查詢 Issue 追蹤器,呈現三個類別,最舊的優先:
- 1. **Unlabeled** — never triaged.
- 2. **`needs-triage`** — evaluation in progress.
- 3. **`needs-info` with reporter activity since the last triage notes** — needs re-evaluation.
+ 1. **未加標籤** — 從未分診。
+ 2. **`needs-triage`** — 評估進行中。
+ 3. **自上次分診筆記以來有報告人活動的 `needs-info`** — 需要重新評估。
- When PRs are in scope, include external PRs in these buckets and tag each line `[PR]` or `[issue]`. Discovery surfaces only *external* PRs (the tracker config defines who counts as external) — a collaborator's in-flight PR is not triage work. This filter is discovery-only; an explicitly named PR is always triaged regardless of author.
+ 當 PR 在範圍內時,把外部 PR 納入這些類別,並為每一行標上 `[PR]` 或 `[issue]`。探索只會浮現*外部* PR(追蹤器設定會定義誰算是外部)——協作者進行中的 PR 不是分診工作。這個過濾只影響探索;被明確點名的 PR,無論作者是誰都會被分診。
- Show counts and a one-line summary per item. Let the maintainer pick.
+ 顯示每個項目的數量與一行摘要。讓維護者挑選。
- ## Triage a specific issue or PR
+ ## 分診特定的 issue 或 PR
- 1. **Gather context.** Read the full issue or PR (body, comments, labels, author, dates; for a PR, the diff too). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the project's domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Run two checks against the codebase: (a) **redundancy** — search for an existing implementation of the requested behavior by domain concept (not just the request's wording), and report where you looked. If found, it's an already-implemented `wontfix` (step 5). (b) **prior rejection** — read `.out-of-scope/*.md` and surface any that resembles this request.
+ 1. **收集上下文。** 讀取完整的 issue 或 PR(內文、評論、標籤、作者、日期;若是 PR,還包括 diff)。解析任何先前的分診筆記,這樣你就不會重問已經解決的問題。使用專案的領域詞彙表探索程式碼庫,並尊重該區域的 ADR。對程式碼庫執行兩項檢查:(a) **冗餘**——依領域概念(不只是請求的措辭)搜尋是否已有既有實作,並回報你查過哪裡。如果找到,它就是一項已實作的 `wontfix`(步驟 5)。(b) **先前拒絕**——讀取 `.out-of-scope/*.md`,浮現任何與此請求相似的內容。
- 2. **Recommend.** Tell the maintainer your category and state recommendation with reasoning, plus a brief codebase summary relevant to the request — including whether it's already implemented. Wait for direction.
+ 2. **建議。** 告訴維護者你的類別與狀態建議及理由,外加與此請求相關的簡短程式碼庫摘要——包括它是否已實作。等待指示。
- 3. **Verify the claim.** Before any grilling, check that the claim holds up. For a bug, reproduce it from the reporter's steps. For a PR, confirm the diff does what it claims — check it out, run the relevant tests or commands. Report what happened: confirmed (with code path), failed, or insufficient detail (a strong `needs-info` signal). A confirmed verification makes a much stronger agent brief.
+ 3. **驗證主張。** 在任何 grilling 之前,先檢查主張是否成立。對 bug,依報告人的步驟重現它。對 PR,確認 diff 做到它所宣稱的事——把它 checkout 出來,執行相關的測試或指令。回報發生的事:已確認(附程式碼路徑)、失敗,或細節不足(一個強烈的 `needs-info` 訊號)。已確認的驗證會讓代理簡報強上許多。
- 4. **Grill (if needed).** If the request needs fleshing out, run the `/grilling` and `/domain-modeling` skills together — grill it into shape a round of questions at a time, sharpening domain terms and updating `CONTEXT.md`/ADRs inline as decisions land.
+ 4. **Grill(如果需要)。** 如果請求需要充實內容,就一起運行 `/grilling` 與 `/domain-modeling` 技能——一輪一輪地問問題,把它 grill 成型,磨利領域術語,並在決策落定時就地更新 `CONTEXT.md`/ADR。
- 5. **Apply the outcome:**
- - `ready-for-agent` — post an agent brief comment ([AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md)).
- - `ready-for-human` — same structure as an agent brief, but note why it can't be delegated (judgment calls, external access, design decisions, manual testing).
- - `needs-info` — post triage notes (template below).
- - `wontfix` — close, with the comment depending on *why*:
- - **Already implemented** — the change already exists in the codebase. Point to where it lives; do **not** write to `.out-of-scope/` (that KB is for *rejected* requests, not built ones).
- - **Rejected (bug)** — polite explanation, then close.
- - **Rejected (enhancement)** — write to `.out-of-scope/`, link to it from a comment, then close ([OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md)).
- - `needs-triage` — apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.
+ 5. **套用結果:**
+ - `ready-for-agent` — 貼上代理簡報評論([AGENT-BRIEF.md](AGENT-BRIEF.md))。
+ - `ready-for-human` — 結構與代理簡報相同,但要註明為什麼無法委派(需要判斷、外部存取、設計決策、手動測試)。
+ - `needs-info` — 貼上分診筆記(見下方範本)。
+ - `wontfix` — 關閉,評論依*原因*而定:
+ - **已實作** — 這項變更已存在於程式碼庫。指出它在哪裡;**不要**寫入 `.out-of-scope/`(那個知識庫是給*被拒絕*的請求,不是給已建置的)。
+ - **拒絕(bug)** — 有禮貌地說明,然後關閉。
+ - **拒絕(enhancement)** — 寫入 `.out-of-scope/`,在評論中連結它,然後關閉([OUT-OF-SCOPE.md](OUT-OF-SCOPE.md))。
+ - `needs-triage` — 套用角色。如果已有部分進展,可選擇加上評論。
- ## Quick state override
+ ## 快速狀態覆寫
- If the maintainer says "move #42 to ready-for-agent", trust them and apply the role directly. Confirm what you're about to do (role changes, comment, close), then act. Skip grilling. If moving to `ready-for-agent` without a grilling session, ask whether they want to write an agent brief.
+ 如果維護者說「把 #42 移到 ready-for-agent」,相信他們並直接套用角色。先確認你即將做的事(角色變更、評論、關閉),然後行動。跳過 grilling。如果在沒有 grilling session 的情況下移到 `ready-for-agent`,詢問他們是否要撰寫代理簡報。
- ## Needs-info template
+ ## Needs-info 範本
```markdown
## Triage Notes
**What we've established so far:**
- point 1
- point 2
**What we still need from you (@reporter):**
- question 1
- question 2
```
- Capture everything resolved during grilling under "established so far" so the work isn't lost. Questions must be specific and actionable, not "please provide more info".
+ 把 grilling 期間解決的一切記在「已確立內容」之下,這樣工作才不會遺失。問題必須具體且可執行,而不是「請提供更多資訊」。
- ## Resuming a previous session
+ ## 恢復先前的 session
- If prior triage notes exist on the issue or PR, read them, check whether the reporter has answered any outstanding questions, and present an updated picture before continuing. Don't re-ask resolved questions.
+ 如果 issue 或 PR 上已有先前的分診筆記,讀取它們,檢查報告人是否已回答任何未決問題,並在繼續前呈現更新後的全貌。不要重問已解決的問題。