review-alps · git:20260906.f11fdbb · 2026-09-06 · sha256 086604403c495369
review-alps git:20260906.f11fdbbA
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/086604403c495369.
--- name: review-alps description: Review ALPS repository changes for semantic consistency, source relationships, evaluation limits, and distribution integrity across specifications, the design Skill, resources, tests, and guidance. Repository-development Skill. --- # ALPS Repository Review ## Purpose Make inconsistencies and validation limits in an ALPS repository change clear enough to support a justified change decision. ## Outcomes - The change's effects on Process meaning and applicable requirements are identified. - The consistency of affected sources, translations, and distribution resources is established or qualified by explicit findings. - Findings and validation limits provide evidence for deciding how to proceed with the change. ## Activities The following Tasks are required within the requested review scope. ### Semantic assessment - Identify the affected sources and inspect the complete task-owned diff, including additions and removals. - Read the [Framework](../../../spec/process-framework.md), [Specification](../../../spec/ALPS-SPEC.md), and affected Process Descriptions in full. - Compare changed propositions by subject, modality, action or state, object, condition, quantifier, polarity, exception, and scope. Check that editorial changes preserve meaning and that intentional redefinitions have a basis in the requested design. - Assess each description's Purpose and independently assessable Outcomes for relevance and collective sufficiency. Check necessary detail, Activity/Task cohesion and coverage, boundary roles, and the distinction between work relationships and execution order. - Follow required references and information relationships. Assess source identity, shared conditions, context-limited changes, and effects on related work. - Check that description validity, execution results, satisfaction of requirements, and their supporting evidence remain distinguishable. ### Distribution assessment - Compare the distribution with [AGENTS.md](../../../AGENTS.md): distributed and development Skills, native Host manifests, required sources, and presentation resources. - Run the applicable format and repository integrity checks in the validation Workflow. Examine path resolution from the Plugin's distributed layout. - Apply [sync-locales](../sync-locales/SKILL.md) to affected English/Japanese pairs. ### Finding synthesis - Relate findings to their locations, evidence, effects, and coherent corrections. - Report mechanical checks and semantic review separately, including failed or unperformed checks and unexamined scope. A passing format or path check does not establish Process meaning or Outcome achievement. ## Controls The Framework governs Process meaning, the Specification governs Agent Skill correspondence, and AGENTS governs repository layout. The requested change determines the review's scope. ## Constraints Respect the user's information and authorization boundaries. A review-only request returns findings; it does not authorize editing, executing the described work, or publishing changes.