resolve-repository-state · v1.2.0 · 2026-08-30 · sha256 5e51eaf262256ef8
resolve-repository-state v1.2.0A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/5e51eaf262256ef8.
--- name: resolve-repository-state user-invocable: true version: 1.2.0 argument-hint: <contradiction-id> description: > Resolve an explicit Normalized Repository State contradiction. This is the sole writer allowed to update frozen repository facts or accepted decisions. Triggers: "resolve repository state", "resolve contradiction", "update a frozen repository fact". --- # Resolve Repository State Resolve evidence conflicts explicitly and publish the next frozen snapshot. ## Turn contract ``` ✓ A named contradiction and both evidence sources were read ✓ The disposition is accepted, rejected, or needs-input ✓ Accepted/rejected results publish a frozen snapshot; needs-input stops without freezing ✓ No unrelated fact or decision changed ✓ The closing → Next: block is printed last ``` ## Step 0 — Discover the project (always first) Read the agent guide, documentation map, frozen ledger, and the requested contradiction before deciding anything. ## Process 1. Read the frozen ledger and the contradiction row named by the user. 2. Verify both the frozen fact's evidence and the proposed new evidence. 3. Choose one result: accept new evidence, reject it, or request human input. 4. If human input is required, update the contradiction row with the exact missing evidence or decision, keep snapshot status `contradicted`, and stop without incrementing the snapshot identifier or publishing a frozen snapshot. 5. For an accepted result, supersede the fact or decision with a new row that cites both evidence sources. For a rejected result, retain the fact and record why. 6. For accepted or rejected results only, update the contradiction row, increment the snapshot identifier, set status to `frozen`, and record the next frozen snapshot's source revision. ## Guardrails - This skill is the sole writer for updates to frozen facts and accepted decisions. - A consumer may propose a contradiction but never resolve it inline. - Inference and documentation alone are insufficient to update a fact. ## Portability Without a slash menu, open this file and follow its process in a fresh turn. ## Relationship to other skills Consumes contradictions from every workflow role and produces the snapshot that discovery, planning, execution, review, and audit reuse. The contradiction's `Reported by` field identifies the interrupted role to resume; resolution never defaults a review, audit, or status interruption to planning. ## Done when The contradiction has a recorded disposition, and either the next frozen snapshot is internally consistent or the missing human input is explicit. If human input is required: → Next: provide the requested evidence or decision — resolution cannot continue yet · evidence supplied → rerun /resolve-repository-state <contradiction-id> Otherwise: → Next: resume the interrupted workflow named by `Reported by` — continue from the resolved snapshot · planning was interrupted → /plan-feature <slug> · implementation was interrupted → /execute-phase <NN> · review, audit, or status was interrupted → rerun that same skill