choosing-a-workflow · git:20260915.0a41d5d · 2026-09-15 · sha256 b1cf74e821239fe3
choosing-a-workflow git:20260915.0a41d5dA
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/b1cf74e821239fe3.
--- name: choosing-a-workflow description: "Use at the start of new project onboarding, PR lifecycle work including PR checks, or changes that require choosing product scope, user-visible behavior, or architecture. Not for continuing work already routed to a workflow, non-PR questions, checks, explanations, or localized fully specified work." --- # Choosing a Workflow The root router of the workflow family in `packages/pi-thinkrail-workflow`. It classifies new workflow-eligible work and names the workflow skill that governs it — nothing more. Work already routed resumes its active workflow instead. A routed skill's steps live in that skill alone; read it, don't run it from memory. ## Classify For a new piece of work, read the request and use what is already known to answer three questions: 1. **Is this project onboarding?** No spec graph yet — an empty or effectively empty workspace where the user brings a raw idea, or an existing codebase being set up or specced for the first time. 2. **Is this the PR lifecycle?** Finished work shipping as a pull request, or an existing PR being tended — created, brought up to date, given screenshots, its checks watched, or its review comments addressed. Fixes that flow from a PR's own review comments belong here. 3. **Does the work require a product or design choice?** The request leaves scope, user-visible behavior, or architecture to decide before implementation. If none applies, no workflow is needed: proceed directly without a workflow announcement. A fully specified fix, mechanical refactor, documentation or configuration-only change, question, explanation, or check normally belongs here. If the route is genuinely ambiguous from the request alone, ask one short clarifying question (`ask_user_question`, composed per the **asking-user-questions** concept skill) rather than guessing. ## Route | Classification | Route | |---|---| | Project onboarding — no spec graph yet | Read and follow **setting-up-a-project** | | PR lifecycle work | Read and follow **shipping-a-pr** | | A change requiring a product or design choice | Read and follow **brainstorming** | | None of the above | No matching workflow; proceed directly without announcing the routing result | One route per piece of work. If a request bundles unfinished implementation with PR work, route the implementation first and return to **shipping-a-pr** only after it lands. ## Red flags — stop and re-route - You started implementation while a required product or architecture choice is still unresolved. - You loaded **brainstorming** for work whose observable result and implementation constraints are already specified. - You re-entered this router while continuing work already assigned to a workflow. - You are following a routed skill's steps from memory instead of reading that skill. ## Handoff This skill ends by naming exactly one of: **setting-up-a-project**, **shipping-a-pr**, **brainstorming**, or **no matching workflow** (proceed directly). Adding a workflow to the family adds a row to the table above — see the **writing-workflow-skills** skill.