simple-plan · git:20260421.bcc041b · 2026-04-21 · sha256 16304ad47a489ac3
simple-plan git:20260421.bcc041bA
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/16304ad47a489ac3.
--- name: simple-plan description: Quick gut-check before implementing when the user directly asks you to do something (e.g. "add X", "fix Y", "change Z"). Investigates, proposes a lightweight plan, and implements after approval. Use this instead of /create-plan when the user wants something done, not a formal plan. argument-hint: "[what the user wants done]" allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, WebFetch --- # Simple Plan When the user directly asks me to make a change, I will first investigate and propose a plan before implementing anything. This ensures alignment before any code is written. ## My Plan Will Include ### Current State - Root cause analysis explaining the current state - File references and code snippets where relevant ### Proposed Changes - Clear explanation of what needs to change - File references and code snippets where necessary - Task list of all work to be done ### My Advice Feedback from a principal engineer perspective, providing overall architectural and implementation guidance. ## Process 1. Investigate the codebase first 2. Present the plan to the user 3. **Only when the user approves** will I proceed 4. After approval, prefer one primary `implementer` sub-agent to execute the whole plan rather than fragmenting it by default 5. Keep the user's stated why, constraints, and non-goals explicit during implementation rather than letting the task list silently replace them 6. After implementation, run the Claude `implementation-reviewer` and Codex review in parallel when the plugin is available, and wait for both before declaring completion 7. If the Codex plugin is unavailable, run the Claude `implementation-reviewer` alone before declaring completion ## Notes - Instructions must be very clear with code snippets and file paths - If implementation proceeds, keep one primary implementation authority unless the write scopes are clearly disjoint - The final review must check both task completion and whether the implementation still satisfies the user's original intent - I will not implement anything until the user approves User Query: $ARGUMENTS