git:20260828.116b669 to git:20261017.2f2e03b

3 added, 3 removed. Audit A to A.

---

name: marketing-claims-review

description: Audit or, when authorized, rewrite persuasive product claims against shipped-product evidence. Use for landing pages, marketing-heavy READMEs, feature or pricing pages, comparisons, and calls to action.

---

# Marketing Claims Review

Own claim substantiation, positioning, comparisons, and first-visitor clarity regardless of file location.

## Workflow

1. Confirm pages, audience, and audit-only or authorized rewrite mode.

2. Build a capability map with implementation and runtime evidence taking precedence over marketing prose, demos, and roadmap material.

- 3. Classify material claims as `accurate`, `unclear`, `unsupported`, `exaggerated`, `stale`, or `false`.

+ 3. Classify material claims as `accurate`, `unclear`, `unsupported`, `exaggerated`, `stale`, or `false`. A performance, scale, or adoption number is `accurate` only when its source exists: the benchmark or data, its method, and the version measured.

4. Test whether a first-time visitor can identify the product, intended user, problem, mechanism, difference, limitations, and next action.

5. For each problematic claim, cite evidence and recommend `keep`, `rewrite`, `move`, `remove`, `qualify`, or `prove`.

6. Rewrite only when authorized, preserving distinctions between shipped, partial, experimental, planned, and unsupported behavior.

7. After an authorized rewrite, use `text-improve` to improve the prose without weakening substantiation, necessary qualifications, or intentional voice.

- Use `docs-review` for repository-document structure and discoverability, and `docs-drift-review` only for drift caused by the current change. Comparative claims requiring external competitor evidence remain unverified unless authoritative evidence is available and its use is authorized.

+ Use `docs-review` for repository-document structure and discoverability, and `docs-drift-review` only for drift caused by the current change. Mark a comparative claim about another product unverified unless current, authoritative public evidence supports it, and cite that evidence.

- Do not infer capabilities from aspirations, invent proof, or force parallel agents.

+ Do not infer capabilities from aspirations or invent proof.

Finish with scoped claims, evidence, dispositions, authorized edits, and unresolved proof needs.