startcycle-graph ยท git:20260828.87f962a ยท 2026-08-28 ยท sha256 f5acf360cd018bc7
startcycle-graph git:20260828.87f962aA
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/f5acf360cd018bc7.
--- name: startcycle-graph description: Use when running the autonomous multi-agent build pipeline after /bdbrainstorm or /grill-me. Routes to the startcycle-dispatch Dynamic Workflow, which reads production_artifacts/state.json and invokes Architect, TechLead, UI/UX, Engineering, Media/EventTech, Reviewer, and Shipping in turn per .agents/graph.md's edge table โ the agents never invoke each other. category: bdb-core disable-model-invocation: true --- # ๐ BDB Autonomous Development Cycle (`/startcycle-graph`) **Step 0 โ bootstrap the contract into this project, before calling `Workflow`.** Every agent the dispatcher spawns is told to read/write `production_artifacts/state.json` "per `.agents/state.schema.json`" โ a path resolved against the CURRENT PROJECT, not globally. If this project has never run `/startcycle-graph` before, that file (and `.agents/graph.md`) won't be here yet, and every agent will freelance the state shape instead of conforming to the schema (observed for real: a run's `state.json` was missing `run_id`/`max_iterations`/`gate`/`findings`/`approvals` and had several fields the schema doesn't define at all). Fix it first: ```bash mkdir -p .agents [ -f .agents/graph.md ] || cp "$HOME/.agents/graph.md" .agents/graph.md [ -f .agents/state.schema.json ] || cp "$HOME/.agents/state.schema.json" .agents/state.schema.json ``` If `$HOME/.agents/graph.md` or `$HOME/.agents/state.schema.json` doesn't exist either, stop and tell the user: this machine has no canonical copy of the graph contract to bootstrap from, and `/startcycle-graph` will produce a non-conforming `state.json` until one is installed. Don't silently proceed. (`.claude/agents/*.md`, the seven agent persona files, do NOT need this treatment โ Claude Code resolves subagents from the user-level `~/.claude/agents/` fine without a project-local copy.) **Action โ do this, and nothing else:** call the `Workflow` tool with `scriptPath` pointing at this repo's dispatcher script โ resolve `$HOME` yourself (e.g. `echo $HOME` or your own environment info) rather than hardcoding a username, giving `$HOME/.claude/workflows/startcycle-dispatch.mjs` โ and `args` set to the goal text that follows `ARGUMENTS:` below this file's content. Pass the goal through verbatim. If there is no `ARGUMENTS:` text, pass no `args` (or `args: undefined`) โ the workflow itself asks for a goal in that case rather than guessing one. Use `scriptPath`, not `name: "startcycle-dispatch"` โ by-name lookup for a custom (non-built-in) workflow script has been observed to fail with `Workflow "startcycle-dispatch" not found. Available: deep-research`, even when the script exists at the expected path and is correctly named inside its own `meta.name`. `scriptPath` pointing directly at the file works reliably; `name` apparently requires a separate registration step (the `/workflows` monitor's `s save` action looked like a candidate, but that's an interactive step a slash command can't trigger on its own, so don't rely on it). Then wait for the `Workflow` tool call to finish and report its result (including `phase`, any `reason`, and โ at `ready_to_ship` โ the instruction to reply `GO`) back to the user. Do not summarize or reinterpret it; relay it. **Do NOT decompose the task, write anything under `production_artifacts/`, or implement any part of the goal yourself in response to this skill.** This file exists only to route the `/startcycle-graph` slash command to the real dispatcher โ a Dynamic Workflow script (`.claude/workflows/startcycle-dispatch.mjs`) that holds the actual node/edge graph, spawns the seven agents, and drives the repair loop. If you catch yourself about to write a plan file or code directly because of this skill, stop โ that means the `Workflow` tool call was skipped, which is exactly the failure this file was rewritten to close (see `SESSION-HANDOVER-v3.13.md` in the source repo for the incident: an earlier version of this file embedded the full pipeline description in prose, and the model followed it "in spirit" inline instead of invoking the script โ silently skipping the whole graph, with no `state.json`, no subagents, no Reviewer, and no quality gate ever running). ## Why this file is a thin router, not a spec The full contract โ state schema, node/edge table, the Stop-hook loop-keeper, the no-progress guard โ lives in [`.agents/graph.md`](../../../.agents/graph.md) and [`.agents/state.schema.json`](../../../.agents/state.schema.json). Those are read by the dispatcher script itself and by the agents it invokes, not duplicated here โ so there is nothing here to follow "in spirit" instead of actually running. ## If the `Workflow` tool is unavailable Some harnesses (or Claude Code with Dynamic Workflows toggled off in `/config`) have no `Workflow` tool at all. Only in that case, fall back to manually driving `.agents/graph.md`'s node/edge table yourself as the dispatcher: read `production_artifacts/state.json`, decide the next node per the edge predicates, invoke exactly that one agent, and repeat. Never let one agent's output instruct another agent directly โ that hand-off pattern is the thing `.agents/graph.md` (F-17) rules out.