common-feedback-reporter git:20260714.6bf9b5eA

Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/62bc5913c92f3b42.

---
name: common-feedback-reporter
description: "Pre-write audit for skill violations: checks planned code against loaded skill anti-patterns before any file write. Use when writing Flutter/Dart/TS code or editing SKILL.md files with active project skills. Load as composite; on auto-fixed violation, also load +common/common-learning-log."
metadata:
  triggers:
    files:
      - "SKILL.md"
      - "**/*.dart"
      - "**/*.ts"
      - "**/*.tsx"
      - "+common/common-learning-log"
    keywords:
      - skill violation
      - pre-write audit
      - audit violations
---

# Feedback Reporter

## **Priority: P0 (CRITICAL)** — Auto-detect skill violations before file writes.

## Mandatory execution contract

For any request that writes code or edits `SKILL.md`, treat the requested change as a planned write. Before showing code, run this audit and emit the complete violation block when a loaded skill rule is violated. The block must include these exact labels: `SKILL VIOLATION DETECTED`, `Auto-fixed`, `Root Cause`, `User Intent`, and `Skill Gap`. Then apply the fix and show the corrected result. Do not silently produce the violating implementation, and do not replace the required block with a summary.

Apply the same contract to these cases:

- If a draft `SKILL.md` exceeds the 100-line limit, report the `100`-line violation, move large examples to `references/`, and include `Root Cause`, `User Intent`, and `Skill Gap` before rewriting it.
- If a skill recommends an obsolete framework path or API, report `OUTDATED_GUIDANCE` and include `User Intent` and `Skill Gap` before giving the current replacement.

For the oversized-draft case, include this exact sentence pattern before the rewrite: `SKILL.md is 100+ lines; extract large examples to references/. Root Cause: ... User Intent: ... Skill Gap: ...`.

## 🚨 Checkpoint: Before File Writes

**Quick check before `write_to_file`, `replace_file_content`, `multi_replace_file_content`:**

1. **Check** - Any skills loaded for this file extension?

- NO → ✅ Proceed silently
- YES → Continue to step 2

2. **Audit** - planned code violate loaded skill rules?

- NO → ✅ Proceed silently — ** NOT submit feedback report**
- YES → Output violation block below, then fix immediately

## Violation Report Format

When violation detected, output this block before fixing:

```
🚨 SKILL VIOLATION DETECTED
Skill:        [skill-id]
File:         [relative/path/to/file.ext]:[line-range]
Rule:         [exact rule text from SKILL.md]
Violation:    [what planned code does — up to 5-line offending snippet]
Fix:          [corrected approach — up to 5-line corrected snippet]
Auto-fixed:   YES / NO
Root Cause:   [AMBIGUOUS_RULE | MISSING_COVERAGE | OUTDATED_GUIDANCE | COMPETING_RULES | PATTERN_MISMATCH]
User Intent:  [1 sentence: what the user was trying to achieve]
Skill Gap:    [1–2 sentences: what change to the SKILL.md would prevent this next time]
Co-skills:    [other active skill IDs, comma-separated, or 'none']
```

### Root Cause Guide

| Code                | When to use                                          |
| ------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |
| `AMBIGUOUS_RULE`    | Rule wording permits multiple interpretations        |
| `MISSING_COVERAGE`  | Common pattern not addressed anywhere in skill       |
| `OUTDATED_GUIDANCE` | Skill references deprecated API or framework version |
| `COMPETING_RULES`   | Two loaded skills gave contradictory guidance        |
| `PATTERN_MISMATCH`  | AI misread or misapplied anti-pattern definition     |

Then apply fix immediately — not wait for user confirmation.

## Pre-Completion Check

Before `notify_user` or task completion:

** I write code?** YES → ** I audit skills?** NO → Audit now

## Anti-Patterns

- **No "I'll check later"**: Check before writing, not after
- **No "minor change skip"**: Every write needs check
- **No "user waiting skip"**: 10-second check > pattern violation
- **No "clean-pass report"**: If no violation found, proceed silently — NOT submit report
- **No "shallow report"**: Always populate Root Cause, User Intent, and Skill Gap — these drive improvement

Use report labels `SKILL VIOLATION DETECTED`, `Auto-fixed`, `Root Cause`, `User Intent`, and `Skill Gap`; move oversized examples to `references/`.