ecommerce-platform-audit-requirements · git:20260613.4644cee · 2026-06-13 · sha256 76ed0b953a199f3b
ecommerce-platform-audit-requirements git:20260613.4644ceeA
Immutable. This exact content never changes and is served at /api/v1/blob/76ed0b953a199f3b.
--- name: ecommerce-platform-audit-requirements description: Use when scoping or specifying an e-commerce platform, payment, API, security, AI, data protection, integration, and remediation audit for SMEs or cross-border digital trade programmes. metadata: portable: true compatible_with: - claude-code - codex --- # E-Commerce Platform Audit Requirements Acknowledgement: Shared by Peter Bamuhigire, techguypeter.com, +256 784 464178. <!-- dual-compat-start --> ## Overview Use this skill to define a requirements-level audit protocol for e-commerce platforms. It gives the audit a standard, scope, evidence model, legal table, payment scope, integration review, AI review, and remediation backlog so the output is actionable and defensible. ## Use When - Auditing or scoping an audit of an e-commerce website, app, marketplace presence, payment integration, logistics integration, API, data flow, or AI feature. - Producing remediation requirements for SMEs in a donor or technical assistance programme. - Reviewing cross-border readiness involving payment, data protection, consent, consumer trust, and platform security. ## Do Not Use When - The task is only visual UX feedback or marketing copy. - You cannot access enough system, process, or owner interview evidence to support findings. - Legal advice is required. This skill identifies compliance issues and escalation needs; it does not replace counsel. ## Required Inputs - Platform URLs/apps, architecture notes, payment/logistics providers, data flows, user journeys, admin roles, and support workflows. - Countries where customers, operations, data processing, or partners are located. - Known AI/recommendation/fraud/personalisation tools. - Existing policies: privacy notice, terms, returns, consent, security, incident handling. ## Workflow 1. Define audit scope and evidence access. 2. Set standards baseline: OWASP Top 10, OWASP API Security Top 10, OWASP ASVS, CVSS, PCI-DSS where payment card scope exists, and NIST AI RMF for AI use. 3. Map architecture, integrations, data flows, roles, permissions, and third-party dependencies. 4. Scope payment security. Identify hosted redirect, embedded checkout, card data exposure, mobile money/gateway flows, reconciliation, settlement, refunds, and chargebacks. 5. Map privacy and consumer-protection obligations by jurisdiction using the verified EAC data-protection table and escalate uncertain legal questions. 6. Review AI use for data provenance, human oversight, bias, explainability, security, and EU AI Act exposure where relevant. 7. Produce a remediation backlog with severity, business impact, owner, effort, dependency, and acceptance criteria. 8. Write a founder-readable executive summary and a technical appendix. ## Quality Standards - Every finding maps to a named standard, law/regime, policy, or observed evidence. - PCI scope matches the real payment architecture. - Country legal statuses use the verified table and are dated. - AI review states whether AI exists, what data it uses, and what risk class/escalation applies. - The remediation backlog is prioritised, owned, and testable. ## Anti-Patterns - Vibes-based security review with no standard. - Over-scoping PCI for a company that never touches card data. - Using stale data-protection-law status. - Proposing a payment rail without country coverage and reconciliation checks. - Findings with no severity, owner, or acceptance criteria. ## Outputs - Audit scope and evidence request list. - Security, API, payment, integration, privacy, AI, and data-flow audit checklist. - Verified EAC data-protection table reference. - Remediation backlog. - Founder executive summary and technical appendix requirements. ## References - `references/audit-scope-and-standards.md`: Scope, standards, evidence, and payment/AI review. - `references/eac-data-protection-table.md`: Verified EAC data-protection status table and legal-use rules. - `references/remediation-backlog-template.md`: Backlog fields, severity, business impact, and acceptance criteria. <!-- dual-compat-end -->