claude-usage-analyst · git:20260924.bd37af8 · 2026-09-24 · sha256 4c6bb36cb59c1b3b
claude-usage-analyst git:20260924.bd37af8A
Immutable. This exact content is served forever at /api/v1/blob/4c6bb36cb59c1b3b.
---
name: claude-usage-analyst
disable-model-invocation: true
description: Analyze Claude Code and Claude Desktop Code token usage, cost, quota burn, model mix, cache read/write, and 5-hour block consumption using ccusage evidence. Use when the user asks why Claude quota was exhausted, whether a model such as fable/opus/sonnet is unusually expensive, how many tokens were spent today or historically, or needs a human-friendly explanation of local Claude Code CLI/Desktop usage.
---
# Claude Usage Analyst
## Overview
Use this skill to produce evidence-based usage explanations from local `ccusage` data. Separate observed numbers from interpretation, and explain quota burn in human terms.
## Workflow
1. Verify `ccusage` is available:
```bash
ccusage --version
```
If missing, install or update with `npm install -g ccusage@latest` or run with `npx ccusage@latest`.
2. Run the bundled analyzer for the requested window:
```bash
python3 /path/to/claude-usage-analyst/scripts/analyze_claude_usage.py \
--since YYYY-MM-DD --until YYYY-MM-DD --timezone Asia/Shanghai
```
Default `--since/--until` is today in the selected timezone.
For historical comparison, set `--since` to an earlier date such as the first day of the month; otherwise rank/median fields only describe the single target day.
3. If the user asks about a specific model comparison, pass aliases:
```bash
python3 scripts/analyze_claude_usage.py --model-a fable --model-b opus-4-8
```
4. Read `references/explanation-guide.md` when writing the final answer.
## Evidence Rules
- Base numeric claims on `ccusage` output or the bundled analyzer output.
- State the scope: `ccusage claude` measures local Claude Code usage logs, including Claude Desktop's Claude Code sessions when those local logs exist. It is not a complete ordinary Claude.ai chat bill.
- Report dates with timezone.
- Explain cache clearly: cache read tokens are still usage/quota pressure even though the user did not type those words.
- Do not infer Anthropic plan quota rules from local token counts unless the user provides plan details. Say "quota-like pressure" or "ccusage estimated cost/token burn" when exact plan accounting is unknown.
- When comparing models, compare both token volume and estimated cost. A model can have similar token volume but higher cost.
## Output Shape
Use this structure unless the user asks otherwise:
1. Short conclusion in plain language.
2. Evidence table: total tokens, cost, input, output, cache create, cache read.
3. Model comparison table.
4. 5-hour block table when quota exhaustion is discussed.
5. Explanation of why the burn happened.
6. Confidence and caveats.
Keep the answer readable for non-technical users. Avoid unexplained terms like "cache read" without a one-sentence translation.